What age group is at the highest risk of mortality from Nipah virus infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 29, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Nipah Virus Mortality Risk by Age Group

Young adults and middle-aged individuals appear to be at highest mortality risk from Nipah virus infection, though all age groups can be severely affected, with overall case-fatality rates ranging from 40% to 75%. 1, 2, 3

Age Distribution in Nipah Outbreaks

The available evidence from Bangladesh outbreaks (2001-2004) reveals important age-related patterns:

  • Two of the four outbreaks principally affected young persons with a median age of 12 years 2
  • All age groups were affected across the outbreak series, with 62% of affected persons being male 2
  • Among 92 identified patients with Nipah virus infection, 67 (73%) died, indicating uniformly high mortality across age groups 2

Critical Clinical Context

Unlike many viral infections where mortality concentrates in the very young or elderly, Nipah virus demonstrates a different pattern:

  • The virus causes severe febrile encephalitis with respiratory syndrome that has a high mortality rate (40-75%) regardless of age 1, 4, 3
  • Death occurred a median of 6 days (range 2-36 days) after illness onset among those who died 2
  • Clinical features associated with death included temperature >37.8°C, altered mental status, difficulty breathing, and abnormal plantar reflexes—factors not specifically age-dependent 2

Important Caveats

The evidence base for Nipah virus age-specific mortality is limited:

  • Most data comes from Bangladesh outbreaks between 2001-2005, which may not represent all transmission patterns 1, 2
  • The Malaysian outbreak in 1998-1999 involved different transmission dynamics (pig-to-human versus bat-to-human or person-to-person) 1, 4
  • No licensed treatments or vaccines exist, meaning mortality reflects natural disease progression without specific interventions 3, 5

Clinical Implications

The uniformly high case-fatality rate across age groups (40-100% in recognized outbreaks) means that age-based risk stratification is less clinically relevant for Nipah virus than for other respiratory viruses 3, 5. All suspected cases require immediate intensive supportive care regardless of patient age, as the virus affects both the central nervous and respiratory systems with rapid progression 2, 4.

References

Research

Nipah virus: impact, origins, and causes of emergence.

Current infectious disease reports, 2006

Research

Clinical presentation of nipah virus infection in Bangladesh.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2008

Research

Nipah Virus: An Updated Review and Emerging Challenges.

Infectious disorders drug targets, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.