What criteria determine if a patient's visual field defect respects the vertical midline, particularly in those with a history of stroke or brain injury?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 30, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Criteria for Visual Field Defects Respecting the Vertical Midline

A visual field defect respects the vertical midline when the loss occurs in corresponding halves of both eyes (either both right or both left halves), creating a sharp boundary at the vertical meridian that divides the visual field into nasal and temporal halves. This pattern indicates pathology at or posterior to the optic chiasm 1, 2.

Key Anatomical Principles

  • Homonymous hemianopia represents loss in the same half of both visual fields (e.g., right half of both eyes or left half of both eyes), indicating chiasmal or post-chiasmal damage 1.

  • Bitemporal hemianopsia shows loss in the temporal fields of both eyes, suggesting a chiasmal lesion 1.

  • The vertical meridian boundary is anatomically determined by the decussation of nasal retinal fibers at the optic chiasm, where fibers from the nasal half of each retina cross to the opposite side 3, 2.

Distinguishing Features on Visual Field Testing

  • Sharp vertical boundary: The defect creates a precise line at the vertical meridian (0 degrees), with preserved vision on one side and loss on the other 2, 4.

  • Bilateral involvement: Both eyes show corresponding defects on the same side of the vertical meridian, though the defects may be congruent (identical) or incongruent (different shapes) depending on lesion location 4.

  • Congruency patterns: More posterior lesions (occipital cortex) produce highly congruent defects, while more anterior lesions (optic tract) produce less congruent defects 3.

Imaging Correlation

  • MRI of the brain without and with contrast is the preferred imaging modality for patients presenting with homonymous hemianopia or quadrantanopia, as these defects indicate post-chiasmal pathology 3.

  • For bitemporal defects or junctional scotomas, thin-slice MRI through the pituitary and suprasellar region is essential to evaluate the optic chiasm 3.

  • In acute presentations, consider vascular etiologies including anterior or posterior circulation stroke, which are common causes of sudden-onset hemianopic defects 3, 4.

Important Clinical Pitfalls

  • Glaucomatous defects cross the vertical meridian: Nasal steps and arcuate scotomas characteristic of glaucoma do NOT respect the vertical midline, which helps differentiate them from neurological causes 1.

  • Functional or testing artifacts: Rare cases of visual field defects respecting the vertical meridian may occur without distinct chiasmal or post-chiasmal lesions on MRI, potentially due to optic neuritis, testing algorithm artifacts, functional deficits, or optic disc abnormalities 5.

  • Bilateral occipital infarcts: These present with sudden, simultaneous onset of defects, normal funduscopic examination, and require CT or MRI confirmation 6.

  • Cortical vs. glaucomatous patterns: In cases of severe field constriction that might mimic glaucoma (pseudoglaucomatous pattern), examine the optic nerve head and perform OCT—normal structural findings indicate cortical rather than glaucomatous pathology 7.

Reliability Verification

  • Before interpreting any visual field pattern, confirm test reliability: fixation losses <20%, false positives <15%, and false negatives <33% 1.

  • Unreliable tests require repetition before making diagnostic or treatment decisions 1.

References

Guideline

Interpreting Visual Field Reports

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Homonymous hemianopsia.

Klinika oczna, 2012

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Bilateral homonymous hemianopia.

American journal of ophthalmology, 1978

Research

Interpretation of visual field defects respecting the vertical meridian and not related to distinct chiasmal or postchiasmal lesions.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2006

Research

Bilateral altitudinal visual fields.

Annals of ophthalmology, 1990

Guideline

Encefalopatía Hipóxico-Isquémica y Patrón Pseudoglaucomatoso

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.