How is the efficacy of Retatrutide measured in patients with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 30, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

How Retatrutide Efficacy is Measured

Retatrutide efficacy is measured primarily by percentage change in body weight from baseline, with secondary endpoints including achievement of categorical weight loss thresholds (≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%), changes in metabolic parameters (HbA1c, fasting glucose, blood pressure, lipids), and waist circumference reduction. 1, 2

Primary Efficacy Endpoint

  • Percentage change in body weight is the primary outcome measure, assessed at 24 weeks in phase 2 trials, with continued measurement through 48 weeks 1
  • Weight loss is dose-dependent, ranging from -7.2% at 1 mg to -24.2% at 12 mg after 48 weeks of treatment 1, 2

Secondary Weight-Related Endpoints

Categorical Weight Loss Achievement

  • ≥5% weight loss threshold: Achieved by 92-100% of patients on retatrutide 4-12 mg versus 27% on placebo at 48 weeks 1
  • ≥10% weight loss threshold: Achieved by 75-93% of patients on retatrutide 4-12 mg versus 9% on placebo at 48 weeks 1
  • ≥15% weight loss threshold: Achieved by 60-83% of patients on retatrutide 4-12 mg versus 2% on placebo at 48 weeks 1

Body Composition Measures

  • Body mass index (BMI) reduction: Mean difference of -5.38 kg/m² compared to placebo 2
  • Waist circumference reduction: Mean difference of -10.51 cm compared to placebo 2

Glycemic Control Parameters (Type 2 Diabetes Patients)

  • HbA1c reduction: Mean improvement of -0.91% to -2.2% depending on dose and duration 3, 2
  • Fasting plasma glucose: Mean reduction of -23.51 mg/dL compared to placebo 2
  • Achievement of glycemic targets: 82% of participants with type 2 diabetes reached HbA1c ≤6.5% after 36 weeks 3

Cardiometabolic Risk Factors

Blood Pressure

  • Systolic blood pressure: Mean reduction of -9.88 mm Hg compared to placebo 2
  • Diastolic blood pressure: Mean reduction of -3.88 mm Hg compared to placebo 2

Hepatic Outcomes

  • Hepatic steatosis reduction: 82% reduction in liver fat content 3

Lipid Parameters

  • Improvements in lipid profiles are measured, though specific quantitative data varies by trial 3

Safety and Tolerability Measures

  • Adverse event rates: No significant difference in overall adverse events between retatrutide and placebo groups (relative risk: 1.11, P = 0.24) 2
  • Gastrointestinal adverse events: Most common side effects, dose-related and mostly mild-to-moderate in severity 1, 4
  • Heart rate changes: Dose-dependent increases peaking at 24 weeks, then declining thereafter, with increases up to 6.7 beats/min 1, 4

Assessment Timeline

  • Primary endpoint assessment: 24 weeks from baseline 1
  • Extended efficacy assessment: 48 weeks for obesity trials, 36 weeks for type 2 diabetes trials 1, 3
  • Ongoing monitoring: Phase 3 trials are evaluating long-term cardiovascular and renal outcomes 3

Clinical Context Compared to Existing Therapies

  • Retatrutide demonstrates superior weight loss compared to dual GLP-1/GIP agonists like tirzepatide (24.2% vs 20.9% at comparable timepoints) 5, 1
  • The triple agonist mechanism (GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors) provides broader metabolic benefits than single or dual agonists 3, 6

References

Research

Triple Agonism Based Therapies for Obesity.

Current cardiovascular risk reports, 2025

Research

Retatrutide showing promise in obesity (and type 2 diabetes).

Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2023

Guideline

Pharmacological Management of Obesity

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.