What is the Bethesda System (Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses) category?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The Bethesda System categorizes cervical cytology results into several categories, including Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion or Malignancy (NILM), Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US), Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL), Atypical Squamous Cell suspicion of high-grade dysplasia (ASC-H), High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL), and Invasive carcinoma, as reported in the 2014 study 1.

Key Categories

  • Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion or Malignancy (NILM)
  • Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US)
  • Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL)
  • Atypical Squamous Cell suspicion of high-grade dysplasia (ASC-H)
  • High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL)
  • Invasive carcinoma

Management of Abnormal Results

The management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests depends on the category of the result, with colposcopy and colposcopically directed biopsies being indicated for evaluating women with abnormal results, such as positive HPV test results and ASC-US or worse, as stated in the 2014 study 1. The guiding principle for managing abnormal test results is similar management for similar risks.

Importance of Standardized Reporting

The Bethesda System provides a standardized reporting system for classifying cytopathology results, ensuring consistent communication between pathologists and clinicians regarding cytology findings and their clinical significance, which is crucial for making appropriate management decisions based on the risk stratification provided by these categories, as noted in the 2010 study 1.

From the Research

Bethesda Category Overview

  • The Bethesda System provides concise, specific descriptions for classifying cervical cytology 2
  • The system has improved the quality of Pap smear diagnosis in the United States, but the number of women with abnormal Pap smear results has increased 2

Management of Abnormal Pap Smear Results

  • Women with unsatisfactory Pap smears should be re-examined and retested 3
  • Women with satisfactory smears and a diagnosis of "within normal limits" (WNL) or "benign cellular changes" (BCC) should be retested only at recommended screening intervals 3
  • Women with diagnoses of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance, or malignancy should have further investigation (colposcopy) 3

HPV Triage and Management

  • Adjunctive high-risk (HR)-HPV testing is useful for disease risk assessment in women with vaginal atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) Pap results 4
  • HPV triage testing is a reasonable and cost-effective approach for women with ASC-US vaginal Pap results and also a useful option for women with ASC-H vaginal Pap results 4
  • The immediate risk of having high grade squamous lesions (HSIL) in atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (AS-CUS) and concomitant high-risk human papillomavirus (HrHPV) testing as negative is approximately 4% 5

Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry

  • p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used as an adjunct to morphologic assessment of cervical biopsies interpreted as negative or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) from patients with prior high-risk Pap test results 6
  • p16 IHC can increase the detection rate of missed squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and significantly increase the likelihood of HSIL on subsequent biopsy 6

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.