Evaluation of a 56-Year-Old Male with Hoarseness for 1 Month
This patient requires laryngoscopy now—hoarseness persisting beyond 4 weeks mandates direct visualization of the larynx, and at age 56, the risk of serious pathology including laryngeal cancer is significant enough that waiting is not appropriate. 1, 2
Immediate Action Required
Perform or refer for laryngoscopy within days, not weeks. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery explicitly states that laryngoscopy is required when hoarseness fails to resolve within 4 weeks, and no patient should wait longer than 3 months for laryngeal examination. 3, 1 Delays beyond 3 months more than double healthcare costs ($271 to $711) and significantly worsen outcomes for malignancy, leading to higher disease stage and poorer survival. 1, 4
Critical Red Flags to Assess Immediately
Before or during referral, actively screen for these warning signs that would escalate urgency even further: 3, 1, 4
- Tobacco or alcohol use history (this patient's age group has high prevalence)
- Hemoptysis (even minimal blood-tinged sputum)
- Dysphagia or odynophagia (swallowing difficulty or pain)
- Otalgia (referred ear pain, especially unilateral)
- Neck mass on palpation
- Unexplained weight loss
- Progressive worsening of voice quality
- Stridor or respiratory distress
- Recent neck, chest, or thyroid surgery
- Recent endotracheal intubation
- Professional voice user (teacher, singer, salesperson)
The presence of any of these factors requires immediate same-day or next-day laryngoscopy, not routine referral. 1, 4
What NOT to Do Before Laryngoscopy
Do not empirically treat this patient without visualization of the larynx. 1, 4, 2 The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery makes strong recommendations against:
- No antibiotics (unless concurrent signs of bacterial infection beyond the larynx)
- No corticosteroids (systemic or inhaled)
- No proton pump inhibitors or antireflux medications (unless concurrent GERD symptoms are clearly present)
This prohibition exists because 56% of primary care diagnoses change after specialist laryngoscopy, meaning empiric treatment delays accurate diagnosis and risks missing laryngeal cancer or vocal fold paralysis. 1
Pertinent History to Obtain
Conduct a targeted voice-specific history: 3
Voice characteristics:
- Onset pattern (sudden vs. gradual)
- Whether voice is ever normal during the day
- Pain with talking
- Voice fatigue or increased effort to speak
- Changes in pitch, range, or ability to project
- Running out of air when talking
- Voice cracking or breaking
Associated symptoms requiring immediate attention: 3, 1
- Globus sensation (lump in throat)
- Dysphagia or odynophagia
- Chronic throat clearing or cough
- Hemoptysis
- Otalgia
- Dyspnea
- Weight loss or night sweats
Medication review: 4
- Inhaled corticosteroids (cause vocal fold edema)
- ACE inhibitors (chronic cough affecting voice)
- Antihistamines (drying effect)
- Anticoagulants (risk of vocal fold hemorrhage)
Occupational and social history: 3
- Voice demands at work
- Absenteeism due to hoarseness
- Tobacco use (60% of hoarseness patients in one study)
- Alcohol use
Medical history: 3
- Neurologic conditions (stroke, Parkinson's disease, myasthenia gravis)
- Prior neck/chest surgery or radiation
- Diabetes, hypothyroidism
- GERD symptoms
- Asthma or COPD (inhaled steroid use)
Physical Examination
Perform a focused head and neck examination: 3
- Listen to the voice quality (perceptual evaluation of pitch, breathiness, strain)
- Palpate the neck for masses, thyroid enlargement, or lymphadenopathy
- Observe swallowing for discomfort or difficulty
- Assess breathing for stridor or respiratory distress
- Attempt indirect mirror laryngoscopy if trained and equipped (but this does not replace formal laryngoscopy)
Laryngoscopy: The Definitive Diagnostic Step
Laryngoscopy is not optional—it is mandatory at this point. 3, 2 Multiple techniques are acceptable: 3
- Transnasal flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy (most common in office)
- Transoral rigid endoscopy
- Stroboscopy (adds assessment of vocal fold pliability and vibration, particularly useful when symptoms seem out of proportion to findings)
During laryngoscopy, assess: 1
- Vocal fold mobility (paralysis?)
- Mucosal lesions (nodules, polyps, leukoplakia, masses)
- Structural abnormalities
- Signs of inflammation or edema
When to Order Imaging (Only AFTER Laryngoscopy)
Never order CT or MRI before visualizing the larynx. 1, 2 Imaging should only follow laryngoscopy and is indicated when: 2, 5
- Vocal fold paralysis is identified (CT with contrast from skull base to aorticopulmonary window to evaluate the entire recurrent laryngeal nerve path)
- Laryngeal tumor is visualized (CT with contrast to assess extent and staging)
- Unexplained findings require further anatomic evaluation
CT with contrast is the imaging of choice when needed. 2, 5
Critical Context: Why This Matters
52% of laryngeal cancer patients thought their hoarseness was harmless and delayed seeking care, and 40% waited 3 months before seeking attention. 3, 4 In this age group with one month of symptoms, the window for optimal outcomes is narrowing. Population-based studies demonstrate that delays beyond 3 months lead to higher disease stage at diagnosis and worse prognosis. 3
Referral Communication
When referring to otolaryngology, explicitly state: 1
- Duration of hoarseness (1 month)
- Patient age (56, higher risk demographic)
- Presence of any red flags identified
- Request for expedited laryngoscopy within days
- Concern for possible malignancy or vocal fold paralysis
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Assuming hoarseness is benign based on duration alone—one month is already beyond the typical 1-3 week viral laryngitis window 3
- Treating empirically as "laryngitis" or "reflux" without confirming diagnosis 1
- Ordering imaging before laryngoscopy—this delays diagnosis and increases costs 1, 2
- Waiting for symptoms to worsen before acting—early identification improves outcomes 3
- Overlooking patient minimization—patients often don't recognize severity; consider input from family members 4