What is the purpose of packing material after incision and drainage?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The purpose of packing material after incision and drainage of an anorectal abscess is not clearly established.

Key Points

  • The use of packing after drainage of an anorectal abscess remains unproven 1.
  • Common practice is to place an internal dressing (pack) into the cavity following incision and drainage, both for hemostasis and to prevent the premature closure of the skin 1.
  • The pack is then changed regularly until the cavity heals, but this practice may cause pain and additional healthcare expense 1.
  • A recent Cochrane review found that it is unclear whether using internal dressings (packing) for the healing of perianal abscess cavities influences time to healing, wound pain, development of fistulae, abscess recurrence, or other outcomes 1.
  • A subsequent multi-center observational study found that packing is costly and painful and does not add benefit to the healing process 1.

Recommendations

  • No recommendation can be made regarding the use of packing after drainage of an anorectal abscess, based on the available literature 1.
  • The use of packing should be left to individual unit policy and patient discussion 1.

From the Research

Purpose of Packing Material

The purpose of packing material after incision and drainage is a topic of debate, with various studies investigating its effectiveness.

  • The use of packing material is thought to aid hemostasis and prevent reorganization of the abscess 2.
  • However, several studies have found that packing does not significantly impact the failure or recurrence rates after incision and drainage 3, 4, 2, 5.
  • In fact, some studies have found that omitting packing can be less painful for patients without increasing the risk of adverse outcomes 4, 2, 6.

Findings from Studies

  • A study published in 2017 found that packing does not affect outcomes for abscesses less than 5 cm in non-diabetic, non-immunocompromised individuals 3.
  • A randomized clinical trial published in 2022 found that non-packing is less painful than packing without an increase in perianal fistula or abscess recurrence 4.
  • A study published in 2013 found that incision and drainage of subcutaneous abscesses without the use of packing is a safe and effective technique 2.
  • A review published in 2023 concluded that routine postoperative packing of perianal abscesses following incision and drainage is costly, associated with increased pain, and confers no protection against recurrence of abscesses or formation of fistulae 6.
  • A randomized trial published in 2012 found that wound packing does not appear to significantly impact the failure or recurrence rates after simple incision and drainage 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.