What is the percentage-wise comparison of transplacental (in utero) transmission for Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Rubella (German measles), Hepatitis B (HBV), and Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) from most to least likely in a pregnant individual?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 31, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Transplacental (In Utero) Transmission Rates: Ranked from Highest to Lowest

Rubella has the highest transplacental transmission rate at approximately 80-90% during primary maternal infection in early pregnancy, followed by CMV at 30-40% during primary infection, Hepatitis B at 5-15% for true in utero transmission, and HSV with the lowest in utero transmission rate at less than 5%, as HSV transmission occurs predominantly during delivery rather than transplacentally.

Detailed Transmission Rate Breakdown

1. Rubella (German Measles): 80-90%

  • Rubella demonstrates the highest rate of transplacental transmission, particularly when maternal infection occurs during the first trimester 1
  • The virus crosses the placenta efficiently during viremia, causing congenital rubella syndrome with devastating fetal consequences including cardiac defects, deafness, and cataracts
  • Critical caveat: This high transmission rate applies specifically to primary maternal infection during pregnancy; reinfection or vaccination-induced immunity provides robust protection

2. Cytomegalovirus (CMV): 30-40%

  • CMV transmission occurs transplacentally during primary maternal infection, with rates of 30-40% 2
  • The transmission rate is substantially lower (approximately 1-2%) during maternal reactivation or reinfection compared to primary infection
  • Important distinction: Over 90% of HIV-infected pregnant women are CMV antibody positive, which significantly reduces the risk of symptomatic congenital infection 2
  • Symptomatic congenital infection in newborns is predominantly associated with primary maternal CMV infection during pregnancy, not reactivation 2

3. Hepatitis B Virus (HBV): 5-15%

  • True transplacental (in utero) transmission of HBV occurs in only 5-15% of cases 3, 4
  • Critical distinction: While 70-90% of infants born to HBsAg/HBeAg-positive mothers become infected overall, the majority of transmission (approximately 85-95%) occurs during delivery, not in utero 3, 5
  • Transplacental transmission depends heavily on maternal HBeAg status and viral load 4
  • The mechanism involves transplacental leakage of maternal blood and cellular transfer through villous capillary endothelial cells in the placenta 4
  • Key risk factors for in utero transmission: Maternal HBeAg positivity (OR 17.07), threatened preterm labor (OR 5.44), and high maternal HBV DNA concentration 4

4. Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV): <5%

  • HSV has the lowest rate of true transplacental transmission at less than 5% 1
  • Critical distinction: The vast majority (85-90%) of neonatal HSV infections occur during passage through an infected birth canal, not via transplacental route
  • In utero HSV infection is rare and typically associated with primary maternal infection during pregnancy
  • Ultrasound findings suggesting in utero infection (cerebral calcifications, microcephaly, hydrops) are uncommon 2

Clinical Algorithm for Risk Stratification

For Rubella:

  • Verify maternal immunity status before or early in pregnancy
  • If non-immune and exposure occurs, transmission risk approaches 80-90% in first trimester
  • Vaccination is contraindicated during pregnancy but essential for non-immune women postpartum

For CMV:

  • Primary maternal infection carries 30-40% transmission risk 2
  • Reactivation in seropositive mothers carries minimal risk of symptomatic congenital infection
  • Treatment with ganciclovir or valganciclovir may be considered for maternal end-organ disease, though primarily for maternal benefit 2

For Hepatitis B:

  • Screen all pregnant women for HBsAg 2
  • If HBeAg-positive with high viral load, in utero transmission risk is 5-15% 3, 4
  • Prevention strategy: Antiviral therapy in third trimester plus neonatal hepatitis B immunoglobulin and vaccine within 12 hours of birth achieves >90% protective efficacy 5
  • The 5-15% in utero transmission cannot be prevented by postnatal prophylaxis, but the 85-95% intrapartum transmission can be 3

For HSV:

  • In utero transmission is rare (<5%)
  • Focus prevention efforts on avoiding exposure during delivery through cesarean section if active genital lesions are present at labor onset
  • Maternal acyclovir suppression in late pregnancy reduces viral shedding and need for cesarean delivery

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Pitfall #1: Confusing overall perinatal transmission rates with true transplacental (in utero) transmission rates. For HBV, the 70-90% overall transmission rate includes predominantly intrapartum transmission, while only 5-15% is truly transplacental 3, 5.

Pitfall #2: Assuming all CMV-seropositive pregnant women pose equal risk to their fetuses. Primary infection carries 30-40% transmission risk, while reactivation poses minimal risk of symptomatic congenital disease 2.

Pitfall #3: Overestimating HSV transplacental transmission. The <5% in utero rate is vastly different from the 85-90% intrapartum transmission rate, requiring different prevention strategies 1.

Pitfall #4: Failing to distinguish between HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative HBV carriers. HBeAg-positive mothers have 80-90% transmission risk (mostly intrapartum), while HBeAg-negative mothers have only 2-15% transmission risk 5.

References

Research

[Viruses relevant to the mother-child relationship].

Revista medica de Chile, 1990

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Viral hepatitis and pregnancy.

Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica, 1999

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.