Is ceftriaxone (Ceftriaxone) effective against group B streptococcus (GBS) infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 31, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ceftriaxone Coverage for Group B Streptococcus

Yes, ceftriaxone provides excellent coverage against Group B Streptococcus (GBS) with 100% susceptibility documented in clinical studies, though it is not the preferred first-line agent for GBS prophylaxis or treatment. 1, 2

Microbiological Activity

  • Ceftriaxone demonstrates outstanding bactericidal action against Group B streptococci with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.05-0.1 mg/L and minimal bactericidal concentrations of 0.1-0.4 mg/L. 3, 4

  • Multiple surveillance studies confirm 100% susceptibility of GBS isolates to ceftriaxone, making it a reliable alternative when penicillin-based agents cannot be used. 1, 2

  • In animal models, ceftriaxone at doses as low as 2 mg/kg every 8 hours effectively eradicates GBS bacteremia and meningitis, with 100% survival rates compared to untreated controls. 4

Clinical Context: Why Ceftriaxone Is Not First-Line

While ceftriaxone covers GBS effectively, CDC guidelines explicitly recommend penicillin G or ampicillin as preferred agents for GBS prophylaxis and treatment due to their narrower spectrum of activity, which reduces selection pressure for resistant organisms. 5, 6, 7

  • Penicillin G remains the gold standard with universal GBS susceptibility worldwide and no documented resistance. 7

  • Ampicillin (97.26% susceptibility) and penicillin (93.47% susceptibility) maintain near-universal activity against GBS. 1

When Ceftriaxone Is Appropriate for GBS

For Penicillin-Allergic Patients (Non-High-Risk)

  • Cefazolin (a first-generation cephalosporin) is the preferred cephalosporin alternative for intrapartum GBS prophylaxis in women without high-risk penicillin allergy, dosed at 2 g IV initially, then 1 g IV every 8 hours until delivery. 5, 6

  • Cefazolin is preferred over ceftriaxone because it has similar pharmacokinetics to penicillin, achieves high intra-amniotic concentrations, and has a relatively narrow spectrum. 5

  • Approximately 10% of patients with penicillin allergy have cross-reactivity to cephalosporins, so ceftriaxone should not be used in patients with history of anaphylaxis, angioedema, respiratory distress, or urticaria to penicillin or cephalosporins. 5

For Neonatal GBS Infections

  • Ceftriaxone has been successfully used for outpatient completion therapy of uncomplicated non-CNS GBS infections in neonates, administered once daily intramuscularly with no reported complications in long-term follow-up. 8

  • For neonatal sepsis, ampicillin plus gentamicin remains the preferred empiric regimen to provide synergistic killing and broader coverage against both GBS and E. coli. 5, 7

Critical Clinical Caveats

  • Ceftriaxone should never replace penicillin G or ampicillin as first-line therapy when these agents can be safely administered. 5, 6, 7

  • For pregnant women with high-risk penicillin allergy (history of anaphylaxis, angioedema, or urticaria), cephalosporins including ceftriaxone should be avoided entirely; use clindamycin (if susceptible) or vancomycin instead. 5, 6

  • Ceftriaxone's extended half-life (6.5 hours) allows less frequent dosing compared to penicillin or ampicillin, which may be advantageous in specific outpatient or resource-limited settings. 3

  • The broader spectrum of ceftriaxone compared to penicillin increases the risk of selecting for resistant organisms and disrupting normal flora, which is why narrower-spectrum agents are preferred when possible. 5

References

Research

[Relationship of group B streptococcus colonization in late pregnancy with perinatal outcomes].

Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences, 2020

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Group B Streptococcal UTI in Pregnant Women

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Group B Streptococcus Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.