Can BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) cause pneumothorax in patients with large pleural effusions, particularly those with underlying conditions such as heart failure, kidney disease, or cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 31, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

BiPAP and Pneumothorax Risk in Pleural Effusion Patients

I cannot provide you with a case report or article demonstrating that BiPAP causes pneumothorax specifically in patients with large pleural effusions, because the available evidence does not establish this causal relationship.

What the Evidence Actually Shows

BiPAP and Existing Pneumothorax

The guidelines address BiPAP use when pneumothorax is already present, not whether BiPAP causes pneumothorax:

  • BiPAP should be discontinued in patients who have developed a pneumothorax (regardless of size) because positive pressure ventilation may worsen or enlarge an existing pneumothorax 1.
  • The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine guidelines recommend withholding BiPAP "for fear that it may cause progression of the complication" in patients with established pneumothorax 1.
  • The median consensus score was 8 (IQR 5-9) for small pneumothorax and 8 (IQR 6-9) for large pneumothorax regarding BiPAP discontinuation 1, 2.

BiPAP Use in Pleural Effusion

The research evidence shows BiPAP can be used safely in pleural effusion:

  • One study successfully used BiPAP in a patient with malignant pleural effusion without complications, with the patient classified as a responder to BiPAP ventilation 3.
  • BiPAP was found "simple, safe, effective and well tolerated" in patients with respiratory distress from various causes including pleural effusion 3.

Critical Distinction

The concern with BiPAP is progression of existing pneumothorax, not causation of new pneumothorax in pleural effusion patients 1, 2. The guidelines discuss BiPAP discontinuation in the context of hemoptysis and established pneumothorax in cystic fibrosis patients, not as a risk factor for developing pneumothorax in pleural effusion 1.

Clinical Caveat

While positive pressure ventilation theoretically could contribute to barotrauma in any patient with compromised lung parenchyma, no evidence in the provided literature documents BiPAP causing pneumothorax specifically in large pleural effusion patients 1, 2, 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of BiPAP in Patients with Hemothorax and Hemoptysis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

BiPAP ventilation as assistance for patients presenting with respiratory distress in the department of emergency medicine.

American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2003

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.