What renal index is most consistent with prerenal azotemia secondary to dehydration in a 40-year-old male patient with impaired renal function (elevated creatinine) and a history of dehydration?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 1, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Renal Indices in Prerenal Azotemia

The urine osmolality of 450 mOsm/kg is most consistent with prerenal azotemia secondary to dehydration in this patient. 1, 2

Diagnostic Approach to Prerenal Azotemia

In prerenal azotemia from dehydration, the kidneys respond to reduced perfusion by maximally concentrating urine and avidly retaining sodium to preserve intravascular volume. 1 This creates a characteristic pattern of renal indices that distinguishes prerenal causes from intrinsic renal injury (acute tubular necrosis).

Analysis of Each Index

Urine Osmolality (450 mOsm/kg) - CORRECT:

  • In prerenal azotemia, urine osmolality is typically >500 mOsm/kg, reflecting maximal urinary concentration. 2
  • While this patient's value of 450 mOsm/kg is slightly below the classic threshold, it still demonstrates significant concentrating ability and is consistent with prerenal azotemia, especially given the clinical improvement with hydration. 2
  • Values <350 mOsm/kg would suggest acute tubular necrosis instead. 2

Urine Sodium (18 mEq/L) - CORRECT:

  • Prerenal azotemia characteristically shows urine sodium <20 mEq/L (some sources cite <10 mEq/L). 1, 2
  • This reflects avid sodium retention by functioning tubules responding to volume depletion. 1
  • Urine sodium >40 mEq/L would suggest acute tubular necrosis. 2

Fractional Excretion of Sodium (FENa 2.5%) - INCORRECT:

  • Prerenal azotemia demonstrates FENa <1%, with 100% sensitivity for prerenal causes. 1, 2
  • This patient's FENa of 2.5% is elevated and would typically suggest acute tubular necrosis rather than prerenal azotemia. 1, 2
  • FENa >1% indicates impaired tubular sodium reabsorption, inconsistent with functional prerenal physiology. 2

Urine-Plasma Creatinine Ratio (19) - INCORRECT:

  • Prerenal azotemia shows urine-to-plasma creatinine ratio >40. 2
  • This reflects concentrated urine with high creatinine content relative to plasma. 2
  • A ratio of 19 is too low and would suggest acute tubular necrosis (typically <20). 2

BUN/Creatinine Ratio (12:1) - INCORRECT:

  • Prerenal azotemia typically shows BUN/creatinine ratio >20:1. 3
  • The disproportionate BUN elevation occurs because urea is reabsorbed in the proximal tubule and collecting ducts during volume depletion. 4
  • A ratio of 12:1 is within normal range (10-20:1) and does not support prerenal azotemia. 3

Clinical Context

The patient's clinical course—creatinine improving from 3.6 to 2.1 mg/dL after 5 days of hydration—confirms prerenal azotemia, as this condition is potentially reversible if the underlying hypoperfusion is corrected. 1 The bland urine sediment expected in prerenal azotemia (not mentioned but implied by the diagnosis) further supports this. 1

Important Caveats

  • Diuretic use can falsely elevate FENa even in prerenal states, making it less reliable. 5
  • In such cases, fractional excretion of urea (FEUrea) <28% may better discriminate prerenal azotemia from acute tubular necrosis, with 75% sensitivity and 83% specificity. 5
  • The renal failure index (urine sodium ÷ urine-to-plasma creatinine ratio) provides additional discrimination when standard indices are equivocal. 2

References

Guideline

Fractional Excretion of Sodium in Prerenal Azotemia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Azotemia in Clinical Contexts

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.