What are the next steps for a patient with bilateral urothelial (urinary tract lining) masses, small liver lesions, and mediastinal (middle chest cavity) and bilateral axillary (underarm) adenopathy (lymph node enlargement) seen on computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The next steps for bilateral urothelial masses with small liver lesions and mediastinal and bilateral axillary adenopathy seen on CT should include a comprehensive diagnostic workup to confirm malignancy and determine its extent, as recommended by the most recent guidelines from the European Society of Urology and the American College of Radiology 1.

Diagnostic Approach

The diagnostic approach should include:

  • Urologic consultation for cystoscopy with biopsy of the urothelial masses to establish a tissue diagnosis
  • CT-guided or ultrasound-guided biopsy of the liver lesions or accessible lymph nodes to determine if these represent metastatic disease
  • Complete laboratory studies including complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and urinalysis with cytology
  • Additional imaging with PET-CT to evaluate the full extent of disease and identify potential metastases not seen on conventional CT
  • Tumor markers relevant to urothelial carcinoma should be checked

Rationale

This approach is necessary because the imaging findings suggest a potentially advanced urothelial malignancy with metastatic spread to the liver and lymphatic system, as supported by recent studies on the use of CT urography for diagnosing and staging urothelial malignancies 1. The diagnostic confirmation will guide treatment planning, which may involve a multidisciplinary approach including urology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology depending on the stage and grade of disease identified.

Considerations

It is essential to consider the patient's overall health and potential comorbidities when determining the best course of action, as some patients may not be suitable for certain treatments, such as radical cystectomy 1. The use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before cystectomy for T2 and T3 disease has been shown to have a survival benefit, and should be considered in the treatment plan 1.

From the Research

Next Steps for Bilateral Urothelial Masses with Small Liver Lesions and Mediastinal and Bilateral Axillary Adenopathy

  • The patient's condition suggests metastatic urothelial carcinoma, which requires a comprehensive treatment approach 2, 3, 4.
  • The first-line therapy for metastatic bladder cancer (urothelial carcinoma, UC) depends on whether a patient is cisplatin-fit or not 2.
  • For cisplatin-fit patients, the standard chemotherapy protocol is GC (gemcitabine/cisplatin) or alternatively MVAC (methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin) 2.
  • The optimal first-line therapy for cisplatin-unfit patients remains unclear, but one criterion for selecting therapy can be the PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand 1) status of the tumor 2.
  • PD-L1-negative patients may benefit from combination chemotherapy GCa (carboplatin/gemcitabine), while PD-L1-positive patients may benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors such as atezolizumab and pembrolizumab 2, 5.
  • The patient's performance status, access to treatment, and outcomes should be analyzed, and treatment decisions should be made based on individual patient characteristics 6.
  • Emerging strategies for treating urothelial carcinoma include the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted agents, and combination therapies 3, 4, 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.