Next Step in Evaluation: PET/CT is Recommended
The next step in evaluating this patient with a lytic skull lesion is to obtain PET/CT imaging, as explicitly recommended in the radiology report and strongly supported by current guidelines for suspected multiple myeloma and plasma cell disorders. 1, 2
Rationale for PET/CT as the Next Step
Primary Diagnostic Objectives
PET/CT serves two critical functions in this clinical scenario:
Systemic disease detection: PET/CT is essential to determine whether this represents a solitary plasmacytoma versus disseminated multiple myeloma, which fundamentally changes prognosis and treatment. 1, 2
Staging accuracy: In patients with suspected active multiple myeloma with lytic lesions at CT (as in this case), PET/CT should be performed for staging with a grade 1A recommendation. 1
Sensitivity for focal lesions: PET/CT demonstrates 90% sensitivity for detecting focal myelomatous lesions greater than 5 mm and is superior to conventional radiography in detecting lytic disease. 1, 3, 4
Guideline-Based Recommendations
The 2023 European Association of Nuclear Medicine consensus specifically states that patients with suspected active multiple myeloma with lytic lesions at LDCT should undergo staging using PET/CT (median consensus score 9.0/9.0). 1
Whole-body low-dose CT (WBLD-CT) is the novel standard procedure for diagnosis of lytic disease in multiple myeloma (grade 1A), detecting up to 60% more relevant findings than conventional radiography. 1, 3, 2
Concurrent Essential Workup
Laboratory Evaluation Required Immediately
A complete plasma cell dyscrasia panel must be ordered concurrently:
- Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) with immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE) 1, 2
- Serum free light chain (FLC) assay 1, 2
- Quantitative immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) 1
- 24-hour urine for total protein with urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP) and urine immunofixation electrophoresis (UIFE) 1, 2
- Complete blood count with differential 1
- Serum creatinine and calcium levels 1
Bone Marrow Evaluation Timing
Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy with flow cytometry should be performed if:
- PET/CT or laboratory findings suggest plasma cell dyscrasia 1, 2
- This is mandatory for diagnosing solitary plasmacytoma versus multiple myeloma 1, 2
Critical diagnostic consideration: Flow cytometry can detect occult bone marrow disease in 49-68% of patients with apparent solitary plasmacytoma, and these patients have significantly higher progression rates to multiple myeloma (71-72% versus 8-12.5%). 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Biopsy Timing
Never perform internal fixation of a pathological fracture before obtaining a biopsy - this is a critical error that can compromise diagnosis and treatment. 2
Imaging Limitations
- Conventional X-rays should not be relied upon solely, as lytic lesions only become visible after more than 50% of trabecular bone has been lost. 3, 2, 4
- While this patient already has MRI showing the lesion characteristics, MRI depicts bone marrow involvement while CT and PET/CT reveal lytic lesions and metabolic activity. 1, 3
Differential Diagnosis Considerations
The imaging characteristics described (hyperintense T1 and T2 signal with moderate enhancement, no restricted diffusion, minimal dural thickening) are consistent with:
- Multiple myeloma (most common cause of lytic skull lesions in adults) 2
- Solitary plasmacytoma (requires exclusion of systemic disease) 1, 2
- Metastatic disease (PET/CT helps identify primary tumor) 5
- Lymphoproliferative disorder including Langerhans cell histiocytosis (less likely given imaging characteristics) 6
Algorithmic Approach Summary
- Order PET/CT immediately (as recommended in radiology report) 1, 2
- Obtain complete plasma cell dyscrasia laboratory panel concurrently 1, 2
- Perform bone marrow aspiration and biopsy with flow cytometry if imaging or labs suggest plasma cell disorder 1, 2
- Obtain tissue biopsy of the lesion if diagnosis remains uncertain after above workup, ensuring adequate tissue for histology and molecular testing 2
The presence of more than 1 focal lesion on whole-body imaging would characterize this as symptomatic disease requiring therapy, even without additional visible lytic lesions. 1, 3