Is testicular atrophy likely given a discrepancy in ultrasound scan measurements, with testicular lengths of 4cm initially and 3.1cm and 3.4cm on repeat scan, and normal hormone levels, including Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) of 9.9, Luteinizing Hormone (LH) of 7.2, and testosterone of 36.2nmol/L, in a patient with normal sperm count and motility?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 2, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Assessment of Testicular Atrophy

Based on your normal hormonal profile, excellent sperm parameters, and the significant measurement discrepancy between ultrasounds, you most likely do not have meaningful testicular atrophy—the second ultrasound measurements appear to be technically flawed.

Understanding Your Measurements

The discrepancy between your two ultrasounds is striking and points to measurement error rather than true biological change:

  • Initial scan (4cm length): This corresponds to approximately 15-18ml volume, which is completely normal 1
  • Repeat scan (3.1cm and 3.4cm): Using the 0.52 formula that was applied, these measurements yielded 9ml volumes bilaterally 1
  • Critical issue: The 0.52 ellipsoid formula systematically underestimates testicular volume by 20-30% because it assumes perfect ellipsoid geometry 1. The Lambert formula (0.71 coefficient) should be used instead for accurate clinical assessment 1

When recalculated properly with the 0.71 formula, your testicular volumes would be approximately 12-13ml bilaterally, not 9ml 1. This places you at the borderline-small threshold rather than severely atrophic 1.

Your Hormonal and Fertility Profile is Reassuring

Your laboratory results argue strongly against significant testicular dysfunction:

  • FSH 9.9 IU/L (upper-normal range): While this indicates your testes are working harder to maintain sperm production, it is not elevated above the normal range 1. FSH >7.6 IU/L with testicular atrophy indicates impaired spermatogenesis, but your FSH remains within normal limits 2
  • Sperm concentration 60 million/ml: This is well above the normal threshold and indicates robust spermatogenesis 1, 3
  • 50% motility: This is at the lower end of normal but not pathological 1
  • Testosterone 36.2 nmol/L: This is completely normal and indicates adequate Leydig cell function 1

Men with true testicular atrophy (<12ml) typically present with oligospermia or azoospermia, elevated FSH, and reduced testosterone 2. Your profile does not match this pattern.

Technical Measurement Issues Explain the Discrepancy

True biological testicular atrophy over a 4-week period in adults is extremely unlikely unless acute pathology occurred 1. Several technical factors likely explain your measurement discrepancy:

  • Caliper placement errors: Width measurements are particularly prone to error if calipers are not placed at the maximum transverse diameter 1
  • Different sonographers: Inter-operator variability is substantial without standardized technique 1
  • Wrong formula application: The 0.52 coefficient systematically underestimates volume compared to the clinically appropriate 0.71 Lambert formula 1

Research comparing ultrasound to orchidometer measurements shows that Prader orchidometry overestimates volume by approximately 10ml compared to ultrasound 3. A 4cm testis measured by orchidometer corresponds to approximately 15ml by orchidometer but only 12-15ml by ultrasound 1, 3.

What Defines Clinically Significant Atrophy

The threshold that matters clinically is 12ml per testis 1, 2:

  • **Volumes <12ml**: Definitively considered atrophic and associated with impaired spermatogenesis, increased risk of intratubular germ cell neoplasia (>34% risk if testicular cancer develops in men under 30-40 years), and potential infertility 1, 2
  • Volumes 12-15ml: Borderline-small, warranting clinical correlation but not definitively pathological 1
  • Volumes >15ml: Normal 1

Your recalculated volumes of 12-13ml place you at the borderline threshold, not in the severely atrophic category 1.

Recommended Next Steps

Immediate Actions:

  1. Request repeat ultrasound with proper technique 1:

    • Explicitly request use of the Lambert formula (0.71 coefficient) for volume calculation 1
    • High-frequency probe >10 MHz should be used 1
    • Same sonographer should perform measurements when possible 1
    • Three perpendicular dimensions (length, width, height) should be measured on axial slices 1
  2. Compare to contralateral testis: Size discrepancy >2ml or >20% warrants further evaluation to exclude pathology 1

Monitoring Strategy:

Given your excellent fertility parameters, aggressive intervention is not warranted, but monitoring is prudent:

  • Repeat semen analysis every 6-12 months to detect early decline, as single analyses can be misleading due to natural variability 1, 2
  • Remeasure FSH, LH, and testosterone if sperm parameters decline, especially if concentration drops below 20 million/ml 1
  • Teach yourself testicular self-examination given that smaller testicular volumes carry increased cancer risk, particularly if you have history of cryptorchidism 1, 4

High-Risk Scenarios Requiring Urology Referral:

You would need urgent evaluation if 1:

  • Palpable testicular mass develops
  • Rapid testicular atrophy occurs
  • Severe oligospermia (<5 million/ml) develops
  • You are under age 30-40 with history of cryptorchidism (3.6-7.4 times higher risk of germ cell tumors) 1

Addressing Your Concerns About Size

Your embarrassment about testicular size is understandable, but context matters:

  • Normal adult testicles range from 12-30ml with significant individual variation 1, 5
  • Function matters more than absolute size: Your sperm production is excellent, which is what truly matters for fertility and hormonal health 3
  • Volumes of 12-13ml are at the lower end of normal, not pathologically small 1

The most important point: your testes are producing sperm normally and maintaining normal testosterone levels, which indicates they are functioning appropriately despite being on the smaller side 2, 3.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use the 0.52 ellipsoid formula for clinical decision-making, as it systematically underestimates volume and may lead to inappropriate classification of testicular atrophy 1
  • Avoid exogenous testosterone or anabolic steroids, which will completely suppress spermatogenesis through negative feedback and cause azoospermia that can take months to years to recover 1, 2
  • Do not assume single ultrasound measurements are accurate without proper technique and formula application 1

References

Guideline

Testicular Size and Volume Measurement

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Sperm Production in Atrophied Testicles

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Testicular Size and Self-Examination Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

What does a discrepancy in testicular length measurements between two ultrasounds, with one showing 4cm bilaterally and the other showing 3.1cm and 3.4cm, indicate for my fertility given my normal sperm count and high testosterone levels?
Is a testicle length of 4.1 cm considered within the normal range?
What is the estimated testicular volume in milliliters (ml) for a testicle with a length of 4.1 centimeters (cm)?
Is a testicle length of 3.8 cm considered normal in an adult male?
Is a testicle length of 3.5cm considered normal in an adult male?
What are the symptoms if an asymptomatic patient with a suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) experiences a dissection?
What is the recommended dose of diclofenac (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)) suppository for pediatric patients (children over 1 year of age)?
What is the rationale for performing an electrocardiogram (ECG) in newly diagnosed hypertension patients in the UK, according to UK health organization guidelines?
Does NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) Clinical Knowledge Summaries (CKS) recommend an electrocardiogram (ECG) as part of the initial assessment for a patient with newly diagnosed hypertension?
How to treat a hemodynamically stable patient with monomorphic supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and hypertension?
Why don't some healthcare providers (HCPs) perform an electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, particularly those with a low cardiovascular risk profile or no symptoms suggestive of cardiac disease?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.