Assessment of Testicular Atrophy
Based on your normal hormonal profile, excellent sperm parameters, and the significant measurement discrepancy between ultrasounds, you most likely do not have meaningful testicular atrophy—the second ultrasound measurements appear to be technically flawed.
Understanding Your Measurements
The discrepancy between your two ultrasounds is striking and points to measurement error rather than true biological change:
- Initial scan (4cm length): This corresponds to approximately 15-18ml volume, which is completely normal 1
- Repeat scan (3.1cm and 3.4cm): Using the 0.52 formula that was applied, these measurements yielded 9ml volumes bilaterally 1
- Critical issue: The 0.52 ellipsoid formula systematically underestimates testicular volume by 20-30% because it assumes perfect ellipsoid geometry 1. The Lambert formula (0.71 coefficient) should be used instead for accurate clinical assessment 1
When recalculated properly with the 0.71 formula, your testicular volumes would be approximately 12-13ml bilaterally, not 9ml 1. This places you at the borderline-small threshold rather than severely atrophic 1.
Your Hormonal and Fertility Profile is Reassuring
Your laboratory results argue strongly against significant testicular dysfunction:
- FSH 9.9 IU/L (upper-normal range): While this indicates your testes are working harder to maintain sperm production, it is not elevated above the normal range 1. FSH >7.6 IU/L with testicular atrophy indicates impaired spermatogenesis, but your FSH remains within normal limits 2
- Sperm concentration 60 million/ml: This is well above the normal threshold and indicates robust spermatogenesis 1, 3
- 50% motility: This is at the lower end of normal but not pathological 1
- Testosterone 36.2 nmol/L: This is completely normal and indicates adequate Leydig cell function 1
Men with true testicular atrophy (<12ml) typically present with oligospermia or azoospermia, elevated FSH, and reduced testosterone 2. Your profile does not match this pattern.
Technical Measurement Issues Explain the Discrepancy
True biological testicular atrophy over a 4-week period in adults is extremely unlikely unless acute pathology occurred 1. Several technical factors likely explain your measurement discrepancy:
- Caliper placement errors: Width measurements are particularly prone to error if calipers are not placed at the maximum transverse diameter 1
- Different sonographers: Inter-operator variability is substantial without standardized technique 1
- Wrong formula application: The 0.52 coefficient systematically underestimates volume compared to the clinically appropriate 0.71 Lambert formula 1
Research comparing ultrasound to orchidometer measurements shows that Prader orchidometry overestimates volume by approximately 10ml compared to ultrasound 3. A 4cm testis measured by orchidometer corresponds to approximately 15ml by orchidometer but only 12-15ml by ultrasound 1, 3.
What Defines Clinically Significant Atrophy
The threshold that matters clinically is 12ml per testis 1, 2:
- **Volumes <12ml**: Definitively considered atrophic and associated with impaired spermatogenesis, increased risk of intratubular germ cell neoplasia (>34% risk if testicular cancer develops in men under 30-40 years), and potential infertility 1, 2
- Volumes 12-15ml: Borderline-small, warranting clinical correlation but not definitively pathological 1
- Volumes >15ml: Normal 1
Your recalculated volumes of 12-13ml place you at the borderline threshold, not in the severely atrophic category 1.
Recommended Next Steps
Immediate Actions:
Request repeat ultrasound with proper technique 1:
Compare to contralateral testis: Size discrepancy >2ml or >20% warrants further evaluation to exclude pathology 1
Monitoring Strategy:
Given your excellent fertility parameters, aggressive intervention is not warranted, but monitoring is prudent:
- Repeat semen analysis every 6-12 months to detect early decline, as single analyses can be misleading due to natural variability 1, 2
- Remeasure FSH, LH, and testosterone if sperm parameters decline, especially if concentration drops below 20 million/ml 1
- Teach yourself testicular self-examination given that smaller testicular volumes carry increased cancer risk, particularly if you have history of cryptorchidism 1, 4
High-Risk Scenarios Requiring Urology Referral:
You would need urgent evaluation if 1:
- Palpable testicular mass develops
- Rapid testicular atrophy occurs
- Severe oligospermia (<5 million/ml) develops
- You are under age 30-40 with history of cryptorchidism (3.6-7.4 times higher risk of germ cell tumors) 1
Addressing Your Concerns About Size
Your embarrassment about testicular size is understandable, but context matters:
- Normal adult testicles range from 12-30ml with significant individual variation 1, 5
- Function matters more than absolute size: Your sperm production is excellent, which is what truly matters for fertility and hormonal health 3
- Volumes of 12-13ml are at the lower end of normal, not pathologically small 1
The most important point: your testes are producing sperm normally and maintaining normal testosterone levels, which indicates they are functioning appropriately despite being on the smaller side 2, 3.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not use the 0.52 ellipsoid formula for clinical decision-making, as it systematically underestimates volume and may lead to inappropriate classification of testicular atrophy 1
- Avoid exogenous testosterone or anabolic steroids, which will completely suppress spermatogenesis through negative feedback and cause azoospermia that can take months to years to recover 1, 2
- Do not assume single ultrasound measurements are accurate without proper technique and formula application 1