Is Keflex (cephalexin) effective against Gram-positive Bacilli?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 2, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Keflex Coverage Against Gram-Positive Bacilli

Keflex (cephalexin) has limited activity against Gram-positive bacilli, with reliable coverage only for Proteus mirabilis among this group, while lacking activity against most other Gram-positive bacilli including Bacillus species, Listeria, and Corynebacterium. 1

FDA-Approved Spectrum for Gram-Positive Bacilli

The FDA label for cephalexin specifically lists only one Gram-positive bacillus in its approved indications:

  • Proteus mirabilis: Approved for bone infections and genitourinary tract infections 1

Notably absent from the FDA label are other clinically relevant Gram-positive bacilli, indicating lack of reliable activity against these organisms 1.

Clinical Microbiology Data

Research confirms cephalexin's limited Gram-positive bacilli coverage:

  • Proteus mirabilis: 56% of strains inhibited by 12.5 mcg/mL, with 90% inhibited by 25 mcg/mL 2
  • Other Gram-positive bacilli: The FDA label explicitly notes cephalexin "has no activity against Pseudomonas spp." and is "not active against most strains of Enterobacter spp., Morganella morganii, and Proteus vulgaris" 1

Important Gram-Positive Bacilli NOT Covered

Cephalexin lacks activity against clinically important Gram-positive bacilli including:

  • Bacillus species: Guidelines note these organisms "are susceptible only to vancomycin" 3
  • Corynebacterium jeikeium: Requires vancomycin therapy 3
  • Listeria monocytogenes: Not mentioned in cephalexin's spectrum and requires ampicillin-based therapy
  • Anaerobic Gram-positive bacilli: Cephalosporins generally have poor anaerobic coverage 3

Comparison to Other Cephalosporins

When comparing first-generation cephalosporins for Gram-positive coverage:

  • Cephalexin was "less active against viridans group streptococci than other first-generation oral cephalosporins" 3
  • Against Staphylococcus aureus, only 49.1% of strains were suppressed by cephalexin at 3.13 mcg/mL, compared to >90% for cefazolin, cephaloridine, and cephalothin 4
  • The relative potency against S. aureus in decreasing order is: cephaloridine > cephalothin > cefazolin > cephalexin 4

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not use cephalexin for:

  • Suspected Bacillus species infections (including B. anthracis) - requires vancomycin or fluoroquinolones 3
  • Corynebacterium infections - requires vancomycin 3
  • Listeria infections - requires ampicillin-based therapy
  • Infections requiring coverage of anaerobic Gram-positive bacilli - requires metronidazole or other anaerobic agents 3, 5

Appropriate Clinical Use

Cephalexin is appropriate for Gram-positive bacilli only when:

  • Proteus mirabilis is confirmed as the pathogen in bone or urinary tract infections 1
  • Susceptibility testing confirms the isolate is sensitive to cephalexin 1
  • The infection is not severe enough to warrant broader-spectrum therapy 6

The drug achieves adequate serum levels (mean peak 7.7 mcg/mL with 250 mg dose, 12.3 mcg/mL with 500 mg dose) and excellent urinary concentrations (>1000 mcg/mL) to treat susceptible P. mirabilis 1, 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Evaluation of antibacterial activities of cephalosporin antibiotics: cefazolin, cephaloridine, cephalothin, and cephalexin.

Zhonghua Minguo wei sheng wu xue za zhi = Chinese journal of microbiology, 1975

Guideline

Ceftriaxone Spectrum of Activity

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.