Can a 3-year-old child with persistent fever, cough, and cold, who received azithromycin (macrolide antibiotic) for 3 days without resolution, and then received cefpodoxime (third-generation cephalosporin) for 5 days with initial improvement but subsequent recurrence of fever, be at risk for meningitis, given laboratory results showing leukocytosis (total count 22,000) and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (9), followed by a decrease in these values after treatment, and then a recurrence of fever with leukopenia (total count 12,000) and normal CRP (2)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 2, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Clinical Assessment: Meningitis Risk in a 3-Year-Old with Recurrent Fever

Direct Answer

Meningitis is highly unlikely in this child based on the clinical presentation and laboratory findings. The normalized inflammatory markers (TC 12,000 and CRP 2) on day 5, absence of meningeal signs, and initial response to cefpodoxime argue strongly against bacterial meningitis 1, 2.

Evidence-Based Analysis

Why Meningitis is Unlikely

Laboratory markers effectively exclude bacterial meningitis in this case:

  • CRP of 2 mg/L has a 99% negative predictive value for bacterial meningitis in children, with serum CRP being the single most reliable test to distinguish bacterial from viral meningitis 2
  • In children under 6 years, a CRP below 20 mg/L effectively rules out bacterial meningitis (this child has CRP of 2) 3
  • The initial CRP of 9 mg/L was borderline and could represent either viral or early bacterial infection, but the decrease to 2 mg/L indicates resolution of the bacterial process 3, 2

The clinical course argues against meningitis:

  • Bacterial meningitis would not show initial improvement with oral cefpodoxime, then recur with normalized inflammatory markers 1
  • The absence of "other signs" (presumably meaning no meningeal signs, altered consciousness, or severe systemic toxicity) makes meningitis extremely unlikely 1
  • If meningitis were present, the WBC and CRP would remain elevated or increase, not normalize 2

Most Likely Diagnosis: Viral Illness Following Bacterial Respiratory Infection

The clinical pattern suggests:

  • Initial bacterial respiratory infection (possibly pneumonia given the cough, cold, and elevated WBC 22,000 with CRP 9) that responded to cefpodoxime 1, 4
  • Subsequent viral infection causing fever recurrence on day 5, explaining the normalized inflammatory markers 1
  • This "double sickening" pattern is common in young children and does not indicate treatment failure or meningitis 5

Critical Decision Points

When to consider lumbar puncture in febrile children:

  • In children 3-36 months with fever ≥39°C and WBC ≥15,000/mm³ without source, the risk of meningitis is approximately 1 in 1,000 1
  • This child does NOT meet criteria for lumbar puncture because:
    • The WBC has normalized to 12,000 1
    • CRP is 2 mg/L (essentially normal) 2
    • No meningeal signs are present 1
    • The child had an identifiable source (respiratory infection) 1

Management Recommendations

Appropriate next steps:

  • Observe without additional antibiotics if the child appears well, is feeding normally, and has no respiratory distress 1, 5
  • Most respiratory viral infections resolve spontaneously within 7-10 days 1
  • Reassess at 48-72 hours; clinical improvement should be evident 6, 5

Red flags requiring immediate reevaluation:

  • Development of meningeal signs (neck stiffness, photophobia, altered consciousness) 1
  • Persistent high fever beyond 72 hours with worsening clinical status 6
  • Rising inflammatory markers on repeat testing 2
  • Respiratory distress or oxygen desaturation 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not:

  • Order lumbar puncture based solely on fever recurrence when inflammatory markers are normal 2
  • Restart antibiotics for presumed treatment failure when CRP has normalized 3, 2
  • Assume antibiotic failure when the more likely explanation is a new viral infection 1, 5

Do:

  • Use CRP as the primary laboratory test to exclude bacterial meningitis (96% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 99% negative predictive value) 2
  • Recognize that viral infections commonly follow bacterial infections in young children 1
  • Reserve lumbar puncture for children with clinical signs of meningitis or persistently elevated inflammatory markers 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Serum C-reactive protein in the differential diagnosis of acute meningitis.

Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases, 1993

Guideline

Co-Amoxiclav Dosing for Pediatric Upper Respiratory Tract Infections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Amoxicillin Dosing Guidelines for Pediatric Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.