Resolving the Discrepancy Between Lab Report and eGFR
When your lab report states Stage 1 CKD but your eGFR indicates Stage 3a (45-59 mL/min/1.73 m²), you should measure serum cystatin C and use the combined creatinine-cystatin C equation (eGFRcr-cys) to determine your true CKD stage, as this combined equation is significantly more accurate than creatinine alone and will resolve the discrepancy. 1, 2
Understanding the Discrepancy
Your situation represents a common clinical scenario where creatinine-based eGFR may be inaccurate due to non-GFR factors:
- Creatinine-based eGFR can misclassify up to 23% of patients when used alone, particularly in the 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m² range 1
- The lab may be reporting "Stage 1" based on other criteria (such as normal albuminuria or imaging findings) while your eGFR clearly indicates reduced kidney function 1
- Low muscle mass, malnutrition, vegetarian diet, or certain medications can cause creatinine to underestimate true kidney function, making eGFR appear worse than it actually is 1, 2
The KDIGO-Recommended Solution
The 2024 KDIGO guidelines provide a clear algorithmic approach for exactly this situation:
Step 1: Measure Cystatin C
- Request a serum cystatin C measurement from your physician 1, 2
- This is specifically recommended when eGFRcr is 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m² without other markers of kidney damage 1, 2
- Cystatin C is independent of muscle mass, age, sex, and diet, making it more reliable than creatinine alone 2
Step 2: Calculate Combined eGFRcr-cys
- The combined creatinine-cystatin C equation (eGFRcr-cys) is 62% accurate compared to only 38% for creatinine alone 2
- This combined equation consistently outperforms either marker alone across all patient populations 1, 2
- The combined value should be used for all clinical decisions, including CKD staging and medication dosing 2
Step 3: Interpret the Results
If eGFRcr-cys ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²:
- Your lab report is correct—you do not have CKD based on reduced GFR alone 2
- The low creatinine-based eGFR was due to non-GFR factors (likely low muscle mass) 2
If eGFRcr-cys 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m²:
If eGFRcr-cys <45 mL/min/1.73 m²:
Confirm the Diagnosis
CKD requires persistence of abnormalities for ≥3 months:
- Repeat both creatinine and cystatin C measurements in 3 months 2
- Recalculate eGFRcr-cys to confirm stability 2
- A single abnormal measurement does not establish CKD diagnosis 1, 3
Additional Evaluation Needed
While resolving the eGFR discrepancy:
- Check for albuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio) if not already done 1, 4
- Albuminuria ≥30 mg/g confirms kidney damage even if eGFR is normal 1
- This would support a CKD diagnosis regardless of the final eGFR value 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely on creatinine-based eGFR alone when there is clinical suspicion of inaccuracy 1
- Do not ignore the discrepancy—using a single eGFR measurement can overestimate CKD prevalence by 25% 3
- Be aware that thyroid dysfunction, high inflammation, or exogenous steroid use can affect cystatin C levels and should be considered when interpreting results 2
- Ensure your laboratory uses assays calibrated to international reference standards for accurate cystatin C measurement 2
Clinical Implications
Once you have the combined eGFRcr-cys result:
- Use this value for all medication dosing decisions, not the creatinine-based estimate 2
- If confirmed Stage 3a CKD (eGFRcr-cys 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m²), you will need appropriate CKD management including cardiovascular risk reduction, blood pressure control, and monitoring for complications 4, 5
- Stage 3a CKD is typically asymptomatic, so lack of symptoms does not rule out the diagnosis 6