What are the details of each arm in the STAMPEDE (Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy) trial for men with high-risk or metastatic prostate cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 3, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

STAMPEDE Trial Arms: Detailed Overview

The STAMPEDE (Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy) trial is a multiarm, multistage, platform randomized controlled trial that has evaluated multiple treatment strategies for men with high-risk, locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent prostate cancer starting first-line long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) 1.

Core Trial Design and Patient Population

The trial enrolled men with the following characteristics:

  • High-risk locally advanced disease (node-positive OR node-negative with ≥2 of: T3-T4 stage, Gleason 8-10, PSA ≥40 ng/mL) 2
  • Metastatic disease (M1) 1
  • Rapidly relapsing disease with high-risk features 3
  • WHO performance status 0-2 2
  • Starting first-line long-term hormone therapy 1

Median patient characteristics across arms: age 65-70 years, PSA 53-112 ng/mL, with 52-61% having metastatic disease at enrollment 3, 4.

Treatment Arms Evaluated

Control Arm (Standard of Care)

ADT alone for ≥2 years, consisting of:

  • LHRH agonists or antagonists, or bilateral orchiectomy 1
  • Mandatory radiotherapy (74 Gy in 37 fractions or hypofractionated equivalent) for node-negative M0 disease 2
  • Encouraged radiotherapy for node-positive M0 disease 1
  • Optional radiotherapy for metastatic disease 1

Outcomes in control arm (M1 patients): median overall survival 42 months, 2-year overall survival 72%, median failure-free survival 11 months 4.

ADT + Zoledronic Acid Arm

Treatment regimen:

  • Standard ADT plus zoledronic acid 4 mg IV 1
  • Given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, then every 4 weeks until 2 years 1
  • Concurrent use of spironolactone not allowed 5

Results: No survival benefit demonstrated (HR 0.94,95% CI 0.79-1.11, p=0.450) 1. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 32% of patients, similar to control 1.

ADT + Docetaxel Arm

Treatment regimen:

  • Standard ADT plus docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks for 6 cycles 1
  • Prednisolone 10 mg daily during docetaxel treatment 1
  • ADT continued for ≥2 years 1

Results in M1 patients: Median overall survival 5.4 years (65 months) versus 3.6 years (43 months) with ADT alone, representing a 1.8-year survival improvement (HR 0.78,95% CI 0.66-0.93, p=0.006) 6. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 52% versus 32% in control 1.

ADT + Zoledronic Acid + Docetaxel Arm

Treatment regimen:

  • Standard ADT plus both zoledronic acid (as above) and docetaxel (as above) 1
  • Zoledronic acid: 4 mg IV every 3 weeks × 6, then every 4 weeks until 2 years 1
  • Docetaxel: 75 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks × 6 cycles with prednisolone 10 mg daily 1

Results: Median overall survival 76 months (HR 0.82,95% CI 0.69-0.97, p=0.022) 1. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 52% of patients 1. No additional benefit over docetaxel alone was demonstrated.

ADT + Celecoxib Arm (Discontinued)

Treatment regimen:

  • Standard ADT plus celecoxib 400 mg orally twice daily 7
  • Given until 1 year or disease progression 7

Results: Accrual stopped due to lack of benefit (HR 0.94,95% CI 0.74-1.20) 7. 2-year failure-free survival was 51% in both celecoxib and control arms 7. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 25% versus 23% in control 7.

ADT + Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisolone Arm

Treatment regimen:

  • Standard ADT plus abiraterone acetate 1000 mg orally once daily 3
  • Prednisolone 5 mg orally once daily 3
  • Treatment duration: 2 years for patients receiving radiotherapy, or until progression if radiotherapy omitted 3
  • Mandatory radiotherapy for node-negative M0 disease 2

Results in M1 patients: Median overall survival not reached versus 3.6 years with ADT alone (HR 0.61 for metastatic disease) 3. In high-risk M0 patients: 6-year metastasis-free survival 82% versus 69% (HR 0.53,95% CI 0.44-0.64, p<0.0001) 2. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 37% versus 29% in control for the M0 population 2.

Most common grade 3-4 toxicities: hypertension (5-14%), alanine transaminitis (6-13%), with 7 grade 5 events across both abiraterone-containing arms 2.

ADT + Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisolone + Enzalutamide Arm

Treatment regimen:

  • Standard ADT plus abiraterone acetate 1000 mg orally once daily 2
  • Prednisolone 5 mg orally once daily 2
  • Enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily 2
  • Treatment duration: 2 years (or until progression if radiotherapy omitted) 2

Results in high-risk M0 patients: 6-year metastasis-free survival 82% (HR 0.53 versus control, p<0.0001) 2. No evidence of additional benefit over abiraterone alone (interaction HR 1.02,95% CI 0.70-1.50, p=0.91) 2. Grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 58% versus 32% in control 2.

Most common grade 3-4 toxicities: hypertension (14%), alanine transaminitis (13%), with 4 grade 5 events (2 septic shock, 2 sudden death) 2.

Key Clinical Implications

For metastatic (M1) disease: Docetaxel added to ADT provides a clinically meaningful 1.8-year survival benefit and should be standard of care for fit patients (HR 0.78, p=0.006) 6. Abiraterone plus prednisolone added to ADT provides even greater benefit with median OS not reached versus 3.6 years (HR 0.61) 3.

For high-risk non-metastatic (M0) disease: Abiraterone plus prednisolone added to ADT and radiotherapy dramatically improves outcomes with 6-year metastasis-free survival of 82% versus 69% (HR 0.53, p<0.0001) and overall survival HR 0.60 (p<0.0001) 2.

Zoledronic acid showed no survival benefit and should not be used in this setting (HR 0.94, p=0.450) 1. Celecoxib showed no activity and was discontinued (HR 0.94) 7. Adding enzalutamide to abiraterone provided no additional benefit over abiraterone alone (interaction p=0.91) 2.

Related Questions

What are the criteria for initiating abiraterone (abiraterone acetate) in a patient with high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer?
What is the STAMPEDE (Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy) trial and its findings on the use of abiraterone (abiraterone acetate) plus prednisone in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for men with high-risk or metastatic prostate cancer?
What are the key findings of the STAMPEDE (Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy) non-metastatic trial for a patient with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer, specifically T3aN0M0 disease and a Gleason score of 4+3?
What is the recommended treatment for a patient with rising Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels and a history of Crohn's disease, who previously received Abiraterone (abiraterone acetate) and Leuprolide (leuprolide acetate), and has stable prostatomegaly and no evidence of metastasis?
How to manage hyperkalemia risk in a patient taking Zytiga (abiraterone), Prednisone, and Lisinopril (ACE inhibitor)/HCTZ (Hydrochlorothiazide)?
What is the STAMPEDE (Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy) trial and its findings on the use of abiraterone (abiraterone acetate) plus prednisone in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for men with high-risk or metastatic prostate cancer?
What length of terminal ileum is responsible for bile acid reabsorption in a patient with a history of terminal ileal resection?
What doses of semaglutide (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) were used to treat a patient with mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) who has failed standard therapies?
What is the initial management for iron deficiency anemia in a 5-year-old child?
What is the recommended dosage and treatment duration of lactulose for an infant with constipation?
Why do individuals, particularly those with diabetes or other metabolic disorders, experience hypoglycemia despite the body's ability to convert fat and protein into glucose?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.