What is the number needed to vaccinate to prevent one hospitalization due to influenza in individuals aged 50 or older, given a hospitalization rate of 20% in unvaccinated and 6% in vaccinated individuals?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 3, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNV) Calculation

The number needed to vaccinate to prevent one hospitalization is 7 (or approximately 7.14). This is calculated using the absolute risk reduction between unvaccinated (20% hospitalization rate) and vaccinated (6% hospitalization rate) individuals aged ≥50 years who contracted influenza.

Calculation Method

The NNV is determined by the following formula:

NNV = 1 / Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR)

Where ARR = Risk in unvaccinated - Risk in vaccinated

  • Unvaccinated hospitalization rate: 200/1000 = 20% (0.20) 1
  • Vaccinated hospitalization rate: 60/1000 = 6% (0.06) 1
  • Absolute Risk Reduction: 0.20 - 0.06 = 0.14 (14%)
  • NNV: 1/0.14 = 7.14 ≈ 7

Clinical Context and Interpretation

This NNV of 7 represents an exceptionally favorable outcome that warrants careful interpretation:

  • The calculated vaccine effectiveness of 70% (reducing hospitalizations from 20% to 6%) is at the upper end of typical influenza vaccine performance, as the CDC reports vaccine effectiveness is typically 30-70% for preventing hospitalization in elderly persons living outside nursing homes 2, 1

  • This scenario assumes all individuals already contracted influenza, which differs from real-world NNV calculations that account for both infection prevention and hospitalization prevention among those infected 1

  • Real-world NNV values are substantially higher because they must account for the probability of infection itself. The CDC reports that among adults ≥65 years, typical NNV values range from approximately 40-50 for high-risk adults to several hundred for healthy younger adults 1

Important Caveats

This calculation has significant limitations:

  • The question presents a conditional probability scenario (hospitalization given infection), not the typical population-level NNV used in public health decision-making 1, 3

  • Traditional NNV calculations that exclude transmission effects can produce estimates biased by up to 1000-fold compared to calculations incorporating indirect vaccine effects 3

  • The 14% absolute risk reduction demonstrated here is considerably higher than typical influenza vaccine performance in preventing hospitalization, suggesting either optimal vaccine-strain matching or a selected high-risk population 2

Mortality and Quality of Life Considerations

The clinical significance extends beyond hospitalization prevention:

  • Among adults ≥65 years, influenza vaccine is 80% effective in preventing death in nursing home residents, even when effectiveness against illness itself is only 30-40% 2

  • More than 90% of influenza deaths occur in adults ≥65 years, with 20,000-40,000 deaths during severe epidemic years 2, 1

  • Influenza vaccination reduces not only hospitalization rates but also shortens hospital stays by an average of 2.4 days for all causes and 4.9 days for lung disease 4

References

Guideline

Influenza Hospitalization Prevention Guideline

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Reducing major cause-specific hospitalization rates and shortening hospital stays after influenza vaccination.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2004

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.