Why is the bell of the stethoscope (stethoscope) recommended for use in neonates (newborns)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 3, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Use of Bell of Stethoscope in Neonates

The Bell is NOT Specifically Recommended for Neonates

The bell of the stethoscope is not specifically recommended for neonatal auscultation, and in fact, standard practice uses the diaphragm for routine cardiac and respiratory assessment in newborns. The question appears based on a misconception—there is no guideline evidence supporting preferential use of the bell in neonates.

Why the Diaphragm is Preferred in Neonates

  • The diaphragm is the standard choice for neonatal auscultation because it captures the higher-frequency sounds that predominate in newborn cardiorespiratory assessment 1, 2.

  • Neonatal breath sounds have a mean frequency of approximately 334 Hz at 1 minute of life, decreasing to 303 Hz by 2 hours—these are mid-to-high frequency sounds best detected with the diaphragm 2.

  • Heart sounds and pathologic murmurs in neonates are also effectively captured using diaphragm-based technology, as demonstrated by piezoelectric sensors and electronic stethoscopes that function similarly to diaphragms 3, 4.

When the Bell Might Be Considered (Adult Context)

The bell is traditionally used in adults for detecting low-frequency sounds like the S3 heart sound, which occurs during rapid ventricular filling and indicates volume overload 5. However:

  • The S3 is actually a normal physiologic finding in most pregnant patients due to increased blood volume and cardiac output 5.

  • In neonates, the clinical context differs entirely—there is no evidence base for routine bell use in this population.

Modern Alternatives to Traditional Stethoscopes

  • Digital stethoscopes with amplification have shown superior performance in neonatal resuscitation, improving time to first heart rate recording (p < 0.001), total number of heart rate recordings (p < 0.001), and earlier recognition of heart rate changes (p = 0.009) 4.

  • Esophageal stethoscopes provide continuous monitoring of both breath and heart sounds in intubated neonates during transport, with minimal interference from ambient noise 6.

  • Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as "the new clinical tool" that has displaced the traditional stethoscope in many critical care scenarios, particularly for neonatal cardiac assessment and detection of conditions like intraventricular hemorrhage 7, 8.

Clinical Pitfall to Avoid

Do not assume that principles of adult cardiac auscultation (such as bell use for low-frequency sounds) automatically translate to neonatal practice. The acoustic characteristics of neonatal cardiorespiratory sounds, combined with the smaller chest wall surface area, make the diaphragm the appropriate choice for routine assessment 2, 3.

References

Research

Prediction of Neonatal Respiratory Distress in Term Babies at Birth from Digital Stethoscope Recorded Chest Sounds.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2022

Guideline

Optimal Patient Positioning for S3 Auscultation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Indications and Applications

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.