What is the role of immunotherapy, including checkpoint inhibitors like nivolumab (Opdivo) or pembrolizumab (Keytruda), in the treatment of a patient with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 3, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Immunotherapy in Advanced/Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Immunotherapy-based combinations have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic RCC, with PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) combined with either CTLA-4 inhibition or VEGFR-TKIs demonstrating superior survival outcomes compared to historical TKI monotherapy. 1

First-Line Treatment Strategies

For Intermediate/Poor-Risk Clear Cell RCC

The following regimens are FDA-approved and guideline-recommended as first-line options: 1

  • Nivolumab + ipilimumab (dual checkpoint inhibition) is approved specifically for intermediate- and poor-risk patients, demonstrating superior overall survival compared to sunitinib 1, 2

  • Pembrolizumab + axitinib received FDA approval in April 2019 for first-line treatment across all IMDC risk groups 1

  • Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib showed the strongest survival benefit with HR 0.66 for OS (95% CI 0.49-0.88, P=0.005) and median PFS of 23.9 months versus 9.2 months with sunitinib 1, 3

  • Avelumab + axitinib was FDA-approved in May 2019 for first-line treatment 1

  • Nivolumab + cabozantinib is also approved for first-line advanced RCC 2

There is no preferred VEGFR-TKI/PD-1 combination, and indirect cross-trial comparisons should not be made. 1, 3

For Favorable-Risk Clear Cell RCC

The OS signals in favorable-risk patients treated with VEGFR-PD-1 combinations remain immature and not yet superior to sunitinib, though better response rates and PFS data support combination use in this subset 1. VEGFR-TKI/PD-1 combinations are recommended across all IMDC risk groups, including favorable risk. 1, 3

For Sarcomatoid Histology

Nivolumab + ipilimumab is the strongly preferred regimen for sarcomatoid RCC regardless of IMDC risk factors (83% consensus recommendation). 1 This combination achieved:

  • ORR of 56.7% versus 19.2% with sunitinib (P<0.0001) 1
  • Complete response rate of 18.3% versus 0% with sunitinib 1
  • PD-L1 expression ≥1% was observed in 50% of sarcomatoid tumors versus 27.5% of non-sarcomatoid tumors 1

Second-Line Treatment After Prior Anti-Angiogenic Therapy

Nivolumab monotherapy is FDA-approved for patients with advanced RCC who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy. 1, 2 This was the first checkpoint inhibitor approved for RCC in November 2015 1

Non-Clear Cell RCC

Checkpoint blockade has demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity in non-clear cell RCC, and these patients should not be excluded from immunotherapy consideration. 1

Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Data (KEYNOTE-427 Cohort B):

  • ORR of 24.8% (95% CI: 18.5-32.2) across non-clear cell histologies 1
  • Papillary histology: ORR 25.4% 1
  • Unclassified histology: ORR 34.6% 1
  • Chromophobe histology: ORR 9.5% 1
  • Higher response rates in PD-L1+ tumors (CPS ≥1): ORR 33.3% versus 10.3% for CPS <1 1

Adjuvant Setting

Adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles (approximately 12 months) is recommended for intermediate- and high-risk clear cell RCC after nephrectomy, initiated within 12 weeks of surgery. 4

Eligible patients include: 4

  • Intermediate risk: pT2 grade 4 or sarcomatoid N0M0, or pT3 any grade N0M0
  • High risk: pT4 any grade N0M0, or any pT with N+ M0
  • M1 NED after complete resection within 1 year of nephrectomy

Critical caveat: Extensive counseling is mandatory before initiating adjuvant therapy, as a substantial proportion of patients are cured by surgery alone and may receive unnecessary treatment with potential long-term toxicity 4

Key Clinical Considerations

Treatment Selection Algorithm:

  1. Determine histology (clear cell versus non-clear cell) and presence of sarcomatoid features 1

  2. Assess IMDC risk category (favorable, intermediate, poor) for clear cell RCC 1

  3. For sarcomatoid features: Choose nivolumab + ipilimumab 1

  4. For intermediate/poor-risk clear cell: Choose any approved IO/TKI combination or nivolumab + ipilimumab 1

  5. For favorable-risk clear cell: IO/TKI combinations are recommended, though OS benefit versus sunitinib is not yet mature 1

  6. For non-clear cell: Consider pembrolizumab monotherapy, particularly for papillary or unclassified histology 1

Important Pitfalls:

PD-L1 testing is NOT required for treatment selection in RCC - unlike non-small cell lung cancer where PD-L1 ≥50% is required for pembrolizumab monotherapy 3. All approved IO combinations for RCC can be initiated without waiting for PD-L1 results 3

Toxicity management is critical: Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib required dose reductions in 68.8% of patients with 82.4% experiencing grade 3-4 adverse events 3. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11% of patients receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy for non-clear cell RCC 1

Salvage potential after first-line IO: Patients progressing on first-line IO/IO can achieve ORR of 47% with second-line TKI, compared to 13% ORR with second-line therapy after TKI/IO, though PFS-2 and OS were not significantly different between strategies 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Adjuvant Pembrolizumab Dosing for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.