Biophysical Profile Score in High-Risk Pregnancy Assessment
Primary Recommendation
A Biophysical Profile (BPP) score of 8 or 10 (out of 10) is highly reassuring for fetal well-being in high-risk pregnancies, with a perinatal mortality rate of only 1.0 per 1,000 and a false-negative rate of 0.7 per 1,000 within one week of testing. 1, 2
BPP Scoring System and Interpretation
Components and Scoring Method
The BPP evaluates five parameters, each scored as either 0 or 2 points 1:
- Fetal breathing movements: ≥1 episode lasting ≥30 seconds within 30 minutes = 2 points 1
- Discrete body/limb movements: ≥3 movements within 30 minutes = 2 points 1
- Fetal tone: ≥1 episode of active extension with return to flexion = 2 points 1
- Amniotic fluid volume: ≥1 pocket measuring ≥2 cm in vertical dimension = 2 points 1, 3
- Nonstress test (NST): Reactive (≥2 accelerations of ≥15 bpm for ≥15 seconds) = 2 points 1, 4
The ultrasound examination continues until all four ultrasound components meet criteria OR 30 minutes have elapsed, whichever comes first. 1
Score Interpretation and Clinical Action
- Score 8-10: Normal—continue routine surveillance (weekly or twice-weekly) 1, 5
- Score 6: Equivocal—repeat testing within 12-24 hours or consider delivery if at term 1, 5
- Score ≤4: Abnormal—deliver immediately regardless of gestational age 1, 5
Clinical Significance and Predictive Value
Reassurance Value of Normal Testing
A normal BPP provides exceptional reassurance, with stillbirth occurring in only 0.8 per 1,000 cases within one week of a normal test result (negative predictive value >99.9%). 1, 5, 6
- Fetal movement assessment alone has a likelihood ratio of 48.1 for predicting perinatal death 2
- The combined BPP score has a likelihood ratio of 51.0, making it superior to any single parameter 2
- The false-negative rate is only 0.7 per 1,000, meaning a normal test is highly reliable 2
Risk Stratification by Score
The perinatal mortality rate varies dramatically by BPP score 2:
- Normal score (8-10): 1.0 per 1,000 births
- Equivocal score (6): 31.3 per 1,000 births
- Abnormal score (≤4): 200.0 per 1,000 births
The BPP is more accurate at predicting perinatal death from asphyxia (7 of 8 cases detected) than from lethal anomalies (6 of 19 cases detected). 2
When to Use BPP vs. Modified BPP
Modified BPP as First-Line Testing
For most high-risk pregnancies, begin with a modified BPP (NST + amniotic fluid assessment) rather than proceeding directly to full BPP. 1, 5
- The modified BPP combines acute assessment (NST for immediate oxygenation) with chronic assessment (amniotic fluid for placental function over the preceding week) 1
- Modified BPP performs comparably to full BPP with similar negative predictive value (<1 per 1,000) while being less time-intensive 6
Indications for Full BPP
Proceed to full BPP when 1, 5:
- NST is nonreactive after 40 minutes of monitoring
- Oligohydramnios is detected (maximum vertical pocket <2 cm)
- Intrauterine growth restriction is suspected or confirmed
- Modified BPP results are equivocal or concerning
Timing and Frequency of Testing
Initiation of Surveillance
Begin antepartum fetal surveillance at 32-34 weeks' gestation for most high-risk conditions, though timing must be individualized based on the specific indication, gestational age, and likelihood of neonatal survival. 1, 5, 4
High-risk conditions warranting BPP surveillance include 5:
- Hypertensive disorders, diabetes, chronic renal disease
- Intrauterine growth restriction
- Decreased fetal movement
- Multiple gestations with complications
- Amniotic fluid abnormalities
- History of unexplained stillbirth
Testing Frequency
- Standard practice: Weekly or twice-weekly testing, though this frequency lacks rigorous scientific evidence 1, 5, 4
- Critical situations: Daily or more frequent testing may be indicated for severe growth restriction or abnormal Doppler findings 5
Critical Limitations and Caveats
What BPP Cannot Predict
No antenatal test, including BPP, can predict stillbirth related to acute events such as placental abruption or cord accidents, regardless of test frequency or timing. 1, 5, 6, 4
- These acute events account for a significant proportion of stillbirths even with recent normal testing 6
- Solid evidence that current surveillance strategies effectively prevent all antenatal stillbirths is lacking 1
Avoid Testing in Low-Risk Pregnancies
Antenatal fetal surveillance should be reserved exclusively for high-risk pregnancies, as routine testing in low-risk women causes iatrogenic prematurity from false-positive results without improving outcomes. 1, 5, 6
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Fetal sleep cycles: The most common cause of nonreactive NST; always extend monitoring to 40 minutes before declaring nonreactive 4
- Amniotic fluid measurement confusion: Use the 2 cm vertical pocket criterion consistently, as different measurement methods yield different results 3
- Premature intervention: An equivocal score (6) in a preterm pregnancy warrants repeat testing or alternative assessment, not automatic delivery 6
- Ignoring gestational age: At term (≥37 weeks), abnormal testing warrants delivery; preterm, weigh risks of prematurity against intrauterine death 5, 6
Integration with Other Testing Modalities
Umbilical Artery Doppler
When intrauterine growth restriction is identified, add umbilical artery Doppler to BPP surveillance, as this combination reduces perinatal mortality by 29%. 5
- Absent end-diastolic flow: Consider delivery at ≥34 weeks after corticosteroids 5
- Reversed end-diastolic flow: Consider delivery at ≥32 weeks after corticosteroids 5
Acoustic Stimulation
Fetal acoustic stimulation can shorten testing time and reduce false-positive results when performing BPP. 1