Diagnosis of Scabies
Scabies should be diagnosed definitively by light microscopy demonstration of mites, eggs, or mite feces on mineral oil preparations of multiple skin scrapings, using proper technique with vigorous scraping of at least 20 papules to maximize diagnostic yield. 1, 2, 3
Clinical Recognition and When to Suspect Scabies
- Consider scabies in any patient with an unexplained generalized pruritic rash, particularly in long-term care facility residents, immunocompromised individuals, or those with close contact exposure 1, 2, 3
- Pathognomonic sign: Burrows in finger webs are diagnostic when present 2
- Classic presentation: Erythematous papular eruption with serpiginous burrows and intense nocturnal pruritus affecting finger webs, wrists, axillae, waist, buttocks, genitals (in men), and inframammary folds 4, 5
- Atypical presentations in high-risk groups: Debilitated elderly and immunocompromised patients often lack burrows and may present only with hyperkeratosis, papules, or vesicles without typical pruritus 3, 6
Definitive Diagnostic Technique (Gold Standard)
Proper skin scraping procedure 2, 3:
- Place a drop of mineral oil on a sterile scalpel blade and allow oil to flow onto the papule
- Scrape vigorously 6-7 times to remove the top of the papule
- Use the flat side of the scalpel to apply pressure to push the mite out of the burrow
- Transfer oil and scrapings onto a glass slide for microscopic examination
- Scrape at least 20 papules to maximize diagnostic yield 2
Microscopic findings that confirm diagnosis 1, 2, 4, 5:
- Mites (adult or larvae)
- Eggs
- Fecal pellets (scybala)
Alternative Diagnostic Methods
- Adhesive tape test: More sensitive than skin scraping (16% vs 10% positive rate) and can be guided by dermoscopy for improved yield 7
- Dermoscopy: Can suggest scabies diagnosis but requires confirmation with mite detection; dermoscopy-guided tape testing improves diagnostic accuracy 7
- Dermatology consultation: If proper diagnostic equipment unavailable or clinical experience limited 1, 2
Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid
False negatives are common 1, 2, 8:
- Negative microscopy does NOT exclude scabies due to low sensitivity (only 10-20% of cases show visible mites) 1, 4
- Clinical diagnosis may be necessary but carries risk of pseudo-outbreaks 3
Pseudo-outbreaks occur when 3, 6:
- Diagnosis made on clinical findings alone without microscopic confirmation
- Healthcare workers develop anxiety-related pruritus without actual infestation
- This leads to unnecessary mass treatment for psychogenic symptoms
Differential Diagnosis in Special Populations
In immunocompromised patients, distinguish from 1:
- Crusted (Norwegian) scabies: Aggressive infestation with hyperkeratotic plaques, extremely high mite burden, occurs in HIV/AIDS, organ transplant recipients, those on systemic corticosteroids 1
In elderly/debilitated patients 3:
- Presentation often atypical without burrows
- May show only inflammatory changes in intertriginous areas
- Diagnosis often made retrospectively when contacts develop typical rash
Other conditions to exclude 2, 3:
- Atopic eczema: flexural involvement, family history of atopy, generalized dry skin
- Contact dermatitis: may develop in previously stable eczema
- Herpes zoster: painful vesicular rash in dermatomal distribution
- Lice infestation: organisms visible to naked eye
Diagnostic Criteria for Clinical Practice
Use parallel criteria when microscopy unavailable 8:
- Objective skin findings (burrows, papules, distribution pattern)
- Intense nocturnal pruritus
- Positive epidemiological history (multiple family/group members affected)
- Response to specific anti-scabies treatment
- Laboratory proof when possible (mites, eggs, or feces)