Is it appropriate to add Jardiance (Empagliflozin) to the treatment regimen of a patient with type 2 diabetes currently taking metformin 1000 mg twice daily with an HbA1c of 6.5?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 3, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Adding Jardiance to Metformin for HbA1c 6.5%

Adding Jardiance (empagliflozin) to metformin 1000 mg twice daily is not appropriate for a patient with HbA1c 6.5%, as this patient has already achieved excellent glycemic control below the recommended target of <7% for most adults. 1

Current Glycemic Status Assessment

  • The patient's HbA1c of 6.5% is already below the recommended target of <7% for most nonpregnant adults with type 2 diabetes 1
  • The American College of Physicians specifically recommends deintensifying pharmacologic therapy in patients who achieve HbA1c levels less than 6.5%, as no trials demonstrate clinical benefit from targeting below this threshold 1
  • Metformin monotherapy at 2000 mg daily has successfully achieved glycemic control, demonstrating adequate disease management with current therapy 1

Rationale Against Treatment Intensification

  • The harms of intensifying therapy outweigh any potential benefits at this HbA1c level, including increased hypoglycemia risk, treatment burden, and medication costs without demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes 1
  • The ACCORD trial, which targeted HbA1c <6.5%, was discontinued early due to increased overall and cardiovascular-related death with intensive treatment 1
  • Adding Jardiance would increase medication burden and cost (median monthly cost for empagliflozin 25 mg is substantially higher than metformin alone) without evidence of additional benefit at this glycemic level 1

When Jardiance Addition Would Be Appropriate

  • Jardiance should be considered if HbA1c rises to ≥7% despite metformin therapy, particularly in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease 1
  • For patients with HbA1c ≥1.5% above target (≥8.5% if target is 7%), dual therapy initiation is recommended to achieve glycemic goals more rapidly 1
  • The FDA-approved indication for Jardiance includes use "as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus" when glycemic control is inadequate 2

Recommended Management Strategy

  • Continue metformin 1000 mg twice daily as monotherapy and maintain current lifestyle modifications 1
  • Recheck HbA1c every 6 months to monitor for glycemic deterioration, as the patient has achieved stable glycemic control 1
  • Consider periodic vitamin B12 monitoring with long-term metformin use, especially if anemia or peripheral neuropathy develops 1
  • Reassess need for treatment intensification only if HbA1c rises to ≥7% on repeat testing 1

Special Cardiovascular Considerations

  • While Jardiance has proven cardiovascular benefits in patients with established cardiovascular disease (reducing cardiovascular death), these benefits were demonstrated in patients requiring glycemic control improvement 1, 2
  • If this patient has established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or heart failure, Jardiance could be considered for cardiovascular protection independent of glycemic control, but this represents off-label use for cardiovascular indication rather than glycemic management 1
  • The decision to add Jardiance purely for cardiovascular benefit in a patient with HbA1c 6.5% should weigh the proven cardiovascular mortality reduction against the lack of glycemic indication 1

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

  • Do not intensify diabetes therapy based solely on the desire to use newer medications when glycemic targets are already achieved, as this increases treatment burden and costs without improving outcomes 1
  • Avoid the misconception that "lower is always better" for HbA1c—targets below 6.5% have not shown benefit and may cause harm 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.