How does a history of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) impact a patient's candidacy for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 3, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hemiplegia as a Risk Factor for CABG Surgery

A history of hemiplegia (indicating prior stroke) dramatically increases the risk of recurrent neurological complications after CABG and represents the single most powerful predictor of post-CABG stroke, elevating baseline stroke risk from 1.4-3.8% to significantly higher levels—this makes the patient high-risk but not absolutely contraindicated for surgery. 1

Why Hemiplegia Increases CABG Risk

Primary Neurological Concerns

  • Prior stroke is the strongest independent predictor of postoperative neurological complications after CABG, with stroke rates rising substantially compared to patients without cerebrovascular disease history 1, 2

  • The baseline CABG stroke risk is 1-2% in patients without carotid disease, but increases to 8.5% with symptomatic carotid stenosis left untreated 3

  • Patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease (which caused the hemiplegia) have significantly elevated risk for recurrent stroke during CABG due to multiple mechanisms: aortic manipulation, embolic phenomena from cardiopulmonary bypass, and potential underlying carotid stenosis 2, 4, 5

Mechanistic Risk Factors

  • Aortic atherosclerosis and manipulation during CABG is a major source of embolic stroke, particularly in patients with pre-existing cerebrovascular disease 1, 5

  • Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) generates microemboli from gaseous and particulate matter that can cause both overt stroke and cognitive impairment 5

  • Patients with prior stroke often have bilateral carotid artery disease or severe unilateral stenosis, which compounds the risk when combined with surgical manipulation 4, 6

Mandatory Preoperative Evaluation

Required Assessments

  • Carotid duplex scanning is reasonable (Class IIa, Level C) given that history of cerebrovascular disease is specifically listed as a high-risk feature requiring selective screening 7, 1

  • Multidisciplinary team consultation is mandatory (Class I, Level C) involving cardiologist, cardiac surgeon, vascular surgeon, and neurologist when significant carotid stenosis is identified 7, 3

  • If carotid stenosis ≥50% is found with prior stroke history, carotid revascularization in conjunction with CABG is reasonable (Class IIa, Level C), with timing determined by relative severity of cerebral versus cardiac dysfunction 7, 3, 8

Risk Stratification Considerations

  • The patient likely has multiple compounding risk factors beyond just the prior stroke: age, diabetes, hypertension, and aortic atherosclerosis all independently predict neurological complications 2, 4

  • Diabetes mellitus and hypertension are independent predictors of both stroke and encephalopathy after CABG, particularly when combined with prior cerebrovascular disease 1, 2, 4

Surgical Strategy Modifications

Technique Adjustments to Reduce Risk

  • Off-pump CABG with avoidance of aortic manipulation is associated with the lowest rate of neurological complications (0.7%) in high-risk patients with prior stroke or TIA 6

  • In patients with increased risk of perioperative stroke, aortic manipulation including cardiopulmonary bypass or partial clamping is associated with higher rates of postoperative neurological complications (7.2% vs 0.9% without aortic cross-clamping) 6

  • Epiaortic ultrasound scanning (Class IIa, Level B) should be performed to identify ascending aortic atheroma and modify surgical technique to reduce atheroembolic complications 7, 1

Intraoperative Monitoring

  • CPB time minimization is critical, as prolonged CPB time correlates with increased neurological complications 1

  • Consider composite arterial grafts performed on the beating heart as the most effective way of minimizing cerebral injury risk 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume hemiplegia is an absolute contraindication—it increases risk substantially but CABG can still be performed with appropriate precautions and multidisciplinary planning 1, 3

  • Do not proceed with CABG without carotid evaluation—failure to screen for and address significant carotid stenosis in a patient with prior stroke misses an opportunity to reduce recurrent stroke risk 3, 8

  • Do not delay necessary CABG indefinitely for carotid workup in unstable cardiac patients—the relative urgency of myocardial versus cerebral revascularization must guide timing decisions 3

  • Recognize that most peri-CABG strokes are NOT solely carotid-related—aortic clamping/de-clamping and aortic atheromatous disease contribute substantially, requiring epiaortic ultrasound and technique modification 3, 8

Postoperative Surveillance

  • Atrial fibrillation surveillance is essential, as postoperative AF significantly increases stroke risk and occurs frequently after CABG in high-risk patients 1

  • Intensive care unit treatment duration >2 days and respirator requirement >24 hours predict neurological complications and warrant heightened monitoring 2

References

Guideline

Neurological Risk Assessment for CABG in High-Risk Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Carotid Disease in CABG Candidates

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Neurological outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC, 2005

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease with Bilateral Carotid Artery Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.