eGFR Calculation for 36-Year-Old Male with Creatinine 115.61 µmol/L
For a 36-year-old male with serum creatinine of 115.61 µmol/L (1.31 mg/dL), the estimated GFR using the CKD-EPI equation is approximately 68-72 mL/min/1.73 m², which represents normal kidney function and does not meet criteria for chronic kidney disease. 1
Conversion and Calculation Method
First, convert the creatinine from µmol/L to mg/dL: 115.61 µmol/L ÷ 88.4 = 1.31 mg/dL 1
The National Kidney Foundation and American Society of Nephrology recommend using the CKD-EPI equation refit without race variable for GFR estimation, as it provides superior accuracy compared to the MDRD equation, particularly at GFR values >60 mL/min/1.73 m² 1
Using the MDRD equation as an alternative: eGFR = 186 × (1.31)^-1.154 × (36)^-0.203 = approximately 65-68 mL/min/1.73 m² 1
Clinical Interpretation
This eGFR of approximately 68-72 mL/min/1.73 m² does not meet criteria for chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² or presence of albuminuria ≥30 mg/g creatinine 1
Normal GFR is approximately 130 mL/min/1.73 m² for men, with a mean decline of 0.75 mL/min/year starting in the third or fourth decade, so this value is within expected range for a 36-year-old male 1
A GFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m² is associated with increased prevalence of CKD complications and cardiovascular risk, but this patient is above that threshold 2, 1
Important Clinical Caveats
Serum creatinine alone should never be used to assess kidney function because it is affected by muscle mass, creatinine generation, tubular secretion, and extrarenal excretion independent of GFR 1, 3
Factors that can elevate creatinine independently of kidney damage include recent exercise, infection, fever, marked hyperglycemia, hypertension, dietary creatine/creatinine intake from meat consumption, and creatine supplementation 1, 3
eGFR calculations assume steady-state conditions and are invalid when creatinine is acutely elevated from non-renal causes 3
Extremes of muscle mass, obesity, or amputees may have inaccurate GFR estimates, and measured GFR using exogenous filtration markers should be considered in these populations 1
Clinical laboratories should report eGFR rounded to the nearest whole number using units of mL/min/1.73 m², and creatinine should be measured using enzymatic methods where possible, which is more specific than the Jaffe method 1