What genetic test is recommended for a child with severe hemophilia A?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 4, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Genetic Testing for Severe Hemophilia A in Children

For a child with severe hemophilia A, perform F8 gene sequencing that includes testing for the intron 22 inversion first (present in ~30% of severe cases), followed by complete sequencing of all exons, splice junctions, and the promoter region if the inversion is negative, with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to detect large deletions. 1, 2

Recommended Testing Algorithm

First-Line Testing: Intron 22 Inversion

  • Begin with intron 22 inversion testing using single-tube PCR, as this accounts for approximately 30% of severe hemophilia A cases and can be completed rapidly 1, 2
  • The intron 1 inversion should also be assessed, though it is much less common (approximately 1% of cases) 2
  • This initial screening can identify the causative mutation within 14-42 hours depending on laboratory capabilities 1

Second-Line Testing: Complete Gene Sequencing

If inversion testing is negative, proceed with:

  • Systematic sequencing of all 26 exons of the F8 gene 1
  • Sequencing of all splice junctions to detect donor/acceptor site mutations 3
  • Promoter region sequencing 1
  • This comprehensive approach uses 23 PCR products under standardized conditions and identifies mutations in approximately 98% of severe hemophilia A patients 1, 2

Third-Line Testing: Deletion Analysis

  • Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to detect large deletions that may be missed by standard sequencing 2
  • Large deletions carry the highest inhibitor risk (100% in one cohort), making their identification clinically critical for risk stratification 2

Clinical Importance of Mutation Identification

Inhibitor Risk Stratification

The specific mutation type directly impacts inhibitor development risk, which is crucial for treatment planning:

  • Large deletions detected by MLPA: 100% inhibitor risk 2
  • Mutations in the A3 domain: 60% inhibitor risk 2
  • Mutations in the C2 domain: 50% inhibitor risk 2
  • Overall inhibitor prevalence in severe hemophilia A: 26% 2

Genetic Counseling and Family Studies

  • Once the causative mutation is identified, accurate carrier testing becomes straightforward for female family members 1, 4
  • Direct mutation detection is superior to indirect RFLP-based linkage analysis, which only identifies carriers in 58-94% of cases depending on polymorphism informativeness 4
  • Rare cases of de novo mutations in both parents can occur, requiring careful interpretation 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on standard sequencing without MLPA, as large deletions will be missed and these carry the highest inhibitor risk 2
  • Do not skip intron 22 inversion testing in severe cases, as this rapid test identifies nearly one-third of patients and saves time and resources 1, 2
  • Do not assume both parents are carriers in sporadic cases, as de novo mutations occur and can affect genetic counseling 5

Mutation Spectrum Findings

Studies have identified diverse mutation types in severe hemophilia A:

  • Intron 22 inversions: ~30% 2
  • Point mutations: Including missense, nonsense, and splice site mutations 3
  • Large deletions: Detected by MLPA 2
  • Novel mutations: Continuously identified, with 24 novel mutations found in one cohort of 100 patients 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.