What criteria make a patient with advanced or metastatic cancer, such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, or renal cell carcinoma, a candidate for treatment with checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab), nivolumab (nivolumab), or ipilimumab (ipilimumab)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 4, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Candidacy for Checkpoint Inhibitors

Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors—particularly melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma, and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) cancers—are candidates for checkpoint inhibitors when they have adequate performance status (ECOG 0-2), no active autoimmune disease requiring immunosuppression, and disease that has progressed on or after standard therapies (or as first-line in specific contexts). 1, 2

FDA-Approved Indications by Cancer Type

Melanoma

  • Unresectable or metastatic melanoma in treatment-naïve patients: nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or ipilimumab/nivolumab combination are approved 1, 2
  • Adjuvant therapy for completely resected Stage IIB, IIC, III, or IV melanoma in patients ≥12 years: nivolumab and pembrolizumab are approved 1, 2
  • Patients do NOT require PD-L1 testing for melanoma, as checkpoint inhibitors are effective regardless of PD-L1 status 3

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

  • First-line metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥1% and no EGFR/ALK alterations: nivolumab plus ipilimumab 1
  • First-line metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50% and no EGFR/ALK alterations: pembrolizumab monotherapy 2
  • Second-line metastatic NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy: nivolumab (category 1), pembrolizumab (category 1 if PD-L1 ≥1%), or atezolizumab (category 1) 4
  • Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic alterations must have disease progression on FDA-approved targeted therapy before receiving checkpoint inhibitors 1, 2

Renal Cell Carcinoma

  • First-line intermediate or poor-risk advanced RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab plus cabozantinib 1
  • Second-line advanced RCC after prior anti-angiogenic therapy: nivolumab monotherapy 1

Colorectal Cancer

  • MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed after fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan: pembrolizumab or nivolumab (with or without ipilimumab) in patients ≥12 years 4, 1, 2
  • Pembrolizumab is approved for any MSI-H/dMMR solid tumor that has progressed after prior treatment with no satisfactory alternatives 2

Other Approved Indications

  • Urothelial carcinoma: nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, or durvalumab in various settings 4, 1, 2
  • Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: nivolumab or pembrolizumab after platinum-based therapy 4, 1, 2
  • Classical Hodgkin lymphoma: nivolumab or pembrolizumab after relapse post-transplant 4, 1, 2
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma: nivolumab plus ipilimumab after sorafenib 1
  • Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: nivolumab or pembrolizumab in various settings 1, 2

Essential Patient Selection Criteria

Performance Status Requirements

  • ECOG performance status 0-2 is required for most checkpoint inhibitor therapy 4
  • Patients with ECOG PS 3-4 should receive best supportive care rather than checkpoint inhibitors 4
  • Performance status serves as a negative prognostic marker with hazard ratio of 1.5 for worse outcomes 3

Exclusionary Criteria

  • Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppression is a contraindication 4, 1, 2
  • Concurrent immunosuppressive medications (except physiologic corticosteroid replacement) exclude patients 4
  • Active HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection were exclusion criteria in pivotal trials 2
  • History of severe hypersensitivity to other monoclonal antibodies is a contraindication 2

Disease Tempo Considerations for Treatment Selection

  • Low-volume, asymptomatic metastatic disease favors checkpoint immunotherapy as first-line, as there is time for durable immune response to develop 4
  • Rapidly progressive or symptomatic disease may favor BRAF-targeted therapy (if BRAF-mutated melanoma) or clinical trial enrollment, as checkpoint inhibitor responses can take longer to emerge 4
  • Elevated LDH (particularly >2× upper limit of normal) is a negative prognostic marker for both targeted and immunotherapies 3

Biomarker Testing Requirements

Required Testing

  • BRAF V600 mutation testing is required in all unresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma patients to determine eligibility for BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations, regardless of whether immunotherapy is planned first 3
  • MSI-H/dMMR testing should be performed in colorectal cancer to identify candidates for checkpoint inhibitors 4
  • PD-L1 testing is required for pembrolizumab in NSCLC (≥1% for second-line, ≥50% for first-line monotherapy) but NOT routinely recommended for melanoma 4, 3, 2

Biomarkers That Do NOT Exclude Patients

  • PD-L1-negative status does not exclude melanoma patients from anti-PD-1 therapy, as PD-L1-negative patients still achieve 20% response rates 3
  • BRAF wild-type melanoma is equally eligible for checkpoint inhibitors as BRAF-mutant disease 4

Critical Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

Sequencing Errors

  • Do not use ipilimumab monotherapy as first-line in treatment-naïve melanoma patients, as it is inferior to anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination therapy 4, 5
  • Do not rechallenge with the same checkpoint inhibitor class after clear progression (e.g., pembrolizumab after nivolumab failure), as cross-resistance is expected 4, 5
  • Do not use checkpoint inhibitors in EGFR/ALK-positive NSCLC until progression on targeted therapy 4, 1

Toxicity Management Preparedness

  • Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events occur in 10-27% with anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, 12-20% with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, and 50-60% with nivolumab/ipilimumab combination 4
  • Treatment-related deaths occur in up to 2% of patients, varying by checkpoint inhibitor 4
  • Patients must be counseled on the need for proactive monitoring and prompt intervention with immune suppression for immune-related adverse events 4

Contraindications to Combination Therapy

  • Nivolumab/ipilimumab combination should be reserved for patients who can tolerate higher toxicity risk, as grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events approach 65% 6
  • Patient selection for combination therapy must consider overall health, medical history, concomitant therapies, comorbidities, and compliance with toxicity monitoring 4

Special Populations

Brain Metastases

  • Patients with stable, treated brain metastases are eligible for checkpoint inhibitors 4
  • Active, symptomatic brain metastases were exclusion criteria in most pivotal trials 2

Pediatric Patients

  • Checkpoint inhibitors are approved for patients ≥12 years with melanoma or MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer 1, 2

Prior Therapy Requirements

  • No prior ipilimumab was required in KEYNOTE-006 for melanoma 2
  • Progression on ipilimumab (≥2 doses at 3 mg/kg or higher) was required in KEYNOTE-002 2
  • Prior platinum-based chemotherapy is required for second-line NSCLC indications 4

References

Guideline

Biomarker Testing in Melanoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Best Systemic Therapy for BRAF-Negative, PD-L1 Inhibitor-Resistant Metastatic Melanoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Inhibidores del Checkpoint

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.