What is the best management approach for an elderly man with metastatic melanoma in the right axillary lymph nodes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 4, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Elderly Man with Metastatic Melanoma in Right Axillary Lymph Nodes

For an elderly man with 2 out of 2 right axillary lymph nodes positive for metastatic melanoma, the optimal management is complete lymph node dissection followed by systemic immunotherapy with combination ipilimumab plus nivolumab (if BRAF wild-type) or consideration of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (if BRAF-mutated), with treatment selection based on performance status, comorbidities, and disease burden rather than chronological age alone. 1, 2

Initial Staging and Molecular Testing

  • Mandatory BRAF mutation testing must be performed immediately, as this determines the systemic therapy approach and has critical implications for treatment selection 1, 2
  • Complete staging workup including CT chest/abdomen/pelvis and brain MRI to identify distant metastases and confirm stage III disease versus stage IV 1
  • Assess LDH levels, performance status (ECOG), and rate of disease progression as these are key prognostic factors 2
  • Evaluate for additional nodal disease or in-transit metastases that may alter surgical planning 3

Surgical Management

Complete axillary lymph node dissection should be performed with the goal of removing at least 10 lymph nodes to achieve adequate staging and locoregional control. 3

  • The presence of 2/2 positive nodes indicates clinically evident nodal disease (stage IIIB or IIIC depending on primary tumor characteristics) 3
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not applicable here as the patient already has known positive nodes 3
  • Complete (R0) resection is the surgical goal for all resectable disease 1, 2

Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Consideration

  • Consider adjuvant radiation following lymphadenectomy for patients with clinically positive nodes, though this remains controversial (category 2B recommendation) 3
  • The decision should weigh the high risk of nodal relapse against potential toxicity in an elderly patient 3
  • Radiation may be particularly relevant if there are adverse features such as extracapsular extension or multiple positive nodes 3

Systemic Therapy Selection

For BRAF Wild-Type Disease:

Combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by nivolumab maintenance is the preferred first-line option, achieving durable responses in 45-50% of patients with 10-year overall survival of 43%. 1, 2, 4

  • Alternative single-agent options (pembrolizumab or nivolumab monotherapy) should be considered if combination therapy is contraindicated due to comorbidities or frailty 1, 2
  • The elderly can tolerate immunotherapy effectively, though careful monitoring for immune-related adverse events is essential 5

For BRAF-Mutated Disease:

The choice between immunotherapy and targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations) depends on specific clinical characteristics: 1

  • Immunotherapy first is preferred for patients with favorable prognostic features (good performance status, normal LDH, slow disease progression) as it offers potential for long-term durable control 1, 2
  • Targeted therapy first (dabrafenib plus trametinib or other BRAF/MEK combinations) should be considered for patients with poor prognostic features, rapid disease progression, or high disease burden, as it achieves response rates of approximately 70% with rapid onset 3, 1

Special Considerations for Elderly Patients

  • Treatment decisions should be based on functional status, comorbidities, and performance status rather than chronological age alone 3, 6
  • Geriatric assessment may help identify patients who can tolerate aggressive therapy versus those requiring modified approaches 3
  • Both immunotherapy and targeted therapy have shown efficacy and tolerability in older patients with melanoma 5
  • Elderly patients with melanoma often present with more aggressive biological features and more locally advanced tumors 6

Treatment Duration and Monitoring

  • Continue pembrolizumab for up to 24 months or nivolumab beyond 2 years if ongoing response 2
  • For patients achieving complete response after ≥6 months of anti-PD-1 therapy, stopping treatment can be considered with 85-90% remaining disease-free 2
  • Tumor assessments should be conducted every 6-12 weeks initially, then every 12 weeks thereafter 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay systemic therapy in patients with favorable prognostic features, as this represents a missed opportunity for long-term durable control with immunotherapy 1
  • Do not use single-agent BRAF inhibition; combination BRAF/MEK inhibition is the standard for targeted therapy 1
  • Do not assume elderly patients cannot tolerate aggressive therapy based solely on age; functional assessment is more predictive 3, 5
  • Do not perform incomplete lymph node dissection when complete dissection is feasible, as adequate staging requires at least 10 nodes 3
  • Do not use chemotherapy (dacarbazine, temozolomide) as first-line treatment when modern immunotherapy and targeted therapy options are available, as chemotherapy has response rates less than 20% 3, 1

References

Guideline

Treatment for Metastatic Melanoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Oligometastatic Melanoma with Bilateral Lung Metastases

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma in the Elderly.

Current oncology reports, 2022

Research

Melanoma in the elderly.

Giornale italiano di dermatologia e venereologia : organo ufficiale, Societa italiana di dermatologia e sifilografia, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.