What are the current guidelines for managing a traumatic vertebral artery dissection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 4, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Traumatic Vertebral Artery Dissection

For traumatic vertebral artery dissection, initiate antithrombotic therapy immediately for 3-6 months using either anticoagulation (IV heparin followed by warfarin with target INR 2.0-3.0) or antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 81-325 mg daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily), as both approaches show equivalent efficacy in preventing recurrent ischemic events. 1

Diagnostic Approach

Imaging modality selection:

  • CT angiography (CTA) of the head and neck with IV contrast is the preferred initial diagnostic test, with 100% sensitivity compared to MRA (77%) and Doppler ultrasound (71%). 2
  • Imaging must include the entire vertebral artery from its origin at the aortic arch to the basilar artery, as dissection can occur at any point along this course. 2
  • Perform concurrent brain imaging (MRI or CT) to assess for ischemic complications, since 50-95% of patients develop cerebral or retinal ischemia after initial warning symptoms. 3
  • Carotid duplex ultrasonography has limited utility for dissections beginning above the angle of the mandible and is more operator-dependent. 4, 2

Clinical presentation to recognize:

  • Headache and neck pain (often localized to the site of intimal disruption), vertigo, nausea, visual disturbances, or syncope. 4, 3
  • Horner syndrome may be present. 4
  • Symptoms may be delayed from hours to weeks after the traumatic event. 5, 6
  • In patients with severe cervical spine trauma (luxation, subluxation, or fracture), symptoms of vertebral artery dissection may be masked by spinal cord injury symptoms. 6

Medical Management Algorithm

Initial antithrombotic therapy (choose one approach):

Option 1 - Anticoagulation:

  • Start IV heparin immediately, then transition to warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0). 1
  • This yields a 1% stroke/death rate at 3 months and 1.6% at 1 year. 1
  • Annual recurrent stroke/TIA/death rate is 8.3% with anticoagulation. 1, 3

Option 2 - Antiplatelet therapy:

  • Aspirin 81-325 mg daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily. 1, 3
  • This yields a 2% stroke/death rate at 3 months and 3.2% at 1 year. 1
  • Annual recurrent stroke/TIA/death rate is 12.4% with aspirin alone. 1, 3
  • Consider aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole 200 mg twice daily, which reduced vertebrobasilar territory stroke/TIA from 10.8% to 5.7% compared to placebo. 1

The choice between anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy should be based on bleeding risk and patient-specific factors, as the CADISS trial showed no statistically significant difference between approaches (OR 0.56,95% CI 0.10-3.21). 1

Duration:

  • Continue antithrombotic therapy for 3-6 months. 1, 3
  • After the initial 3-6 month period, transition to antiplatelet therapy. 1

Critical Contraindication

Anticoagulation is absolutely contraindicated if subarachnoid hemorrhage occurs from intracranial extension of the dissection, as intracranial vertebrobasilar dissections carry higher rupture risk. 1, 3 This is a common pitfall that can adversely influence outcomes. 4

Endovascular or Surgical Intervention

Reserve invasive treatment exclusively for patients with persistent or recurrent ischemic symptoms despite optimal antithrombotic therapy. 1, 3

Endovascular options:

  • Angioplasty and stenting may be considered when ischemic neurological symptoms have not responded to antithrombotic therapy. 4, 1
  • Periprocedural risks include 5.5% neurological complications, 0.3% death risk, 0.7% posterior stroke risk, and 26% restenosis rate at 12 months. 1

Surgical options:

  • Direct vertebral artery repair or resection with vein graft replacement. 1

Prognosis and Follow-up

With appropriate antithrombotic treatment, the prognosis is usually favorable, with anatomic healing occurring in 72-100% of patients with medical management alone. 4, 1, 3

Key prognostic points:

  • Dissections that do not fully heal anatomically are not associated with increased recurrent stroke risk, so further intervention for asymptomatic lesions is not warranted. 1
  • The risk of hemorrhagic transformation appears low (<5%) in patients with vertebral artery dissection. 1
  • Maintain high suspicion in younger patients, as vertebral artery dissection accounts for 10-15% of ischemic strokes in patients under 45 years. 2

Special Considerations for Trauma Context

In patients with severe cervical spine trauma (fracture, luxation, or subluxation):

  • Perform early Doppler ultrasound and duplex sonography as noninvasive screening, as symptoms of vertebral artery dissection may be disguised by signs of spinal injury. 6
  • The dissection is typically located at the site of vertebral injury or cranial to it. 6
  • Head and neck pain localized to the site of intimal disruption may be the only early sign before catastrophic vertebrobasilar infarction develops. 6

References

Guideline

Treatment of Vertebral Artery Dissection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Diagnostic Imaging for Vertebral Artery Dissection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Vertebral Artery Dissection Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Delayed vertebral artery dissection after mild trauma in a motor vehicle collision.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.