False
Artificial hydration via hypodermoclysis should NOT be used at the end of life in terminal patients, as it is associated with uncertain benefits and substantial risks including increased oral and pulmonary secretions, dyspnea from pulmonary edema, and does not relieve thirst or improve comfort. 1
Critical Distinction: Terminal Phase vs. Crisis Situations
The answer depends entirely on whether the patient is truly in the terminal phase of life versus experiencing a potentially reversible crisis:
Terminal Phase (Last Few Weeks of Life)
- Hypodermoclysis and all forms of artificial hydration are NOT recommended in patients who are actively dying or in the terminal phase of dementia or advanced cancer 1
- The ESPEN guidelines explicitly state: "We recommend against the use of artificial nutrition (enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition and parenteral fluids) in the terminal phase of life" 1
- Artificial hydration in dying patients causes discomfort through increased oral and pulmonary secretions and dyspnea due to pulmonary edema 1
- Thirst in dying patients is NOT relieved by parenteral fluids but rather by oral care, moistening the mouth, ice chips, and small sips of fluid 1
- Dying patients rarely experience hunger and thirst; when present, thirst results from dry mouth and can be managed with nursing measures 1
Potentially Reversible Crisis Situations
- Hypodermoclysis IS appropriate for limited periods in mild-to-moderate dementia or advanced illness when dehydration is caused by a potentially reversible condition (febrile illness, diarrhea, acute infection) 1, 2
- The ESPEN guidelines suggest: "parenteral fluids for a limited period of time in periods of insufficient fluid intake to overcome a crisis situation" 1
- This applies when patients have dysphagia or perturbed perception of thirst but are NOT in the terminal phase 1
Technical Specifications When Hypodermoclysis IS Indicated
For crisis situations in non-terminal patients:
- Maximum volume: 3000 mL per day, with maximum 1500 mL per infusion site 1, 2
- Typical daily volumes: 1000 mL or less in most reported cases 1, 2
- Fluid type: Only isotonic electrolyte solutions (0.9% normal saline or lactated Ringer's) 1, 2
- Effectiveness: Hypodermoclysis is as effective as IV hydration for mild-to-moderate dehydration 1
- Advantages: Less discomfort, patients less likely to interfere with subcutaneous lines compared to IV lines, easier to maintain in home/nursing home settings 1, 3
Contraindications to Hypodermoclysis
Even in crisis situations, hypodermoclysis is NOT suitable for:
- Patients needing large volumes of fluid 1
- Hypertonic or electrolyte-free solutions 1
- Coagulation disorders 1
- Dermatological problems at infusion sites 1
- Severe malnutrition with lack of subcutaneous tissue 1
- Terminal phase of life 1
Evidence Supporting Non-Use at End of Life
- Observational studies show that forgoing artificial hydration in terminal dementia patients with severe disability is NOT associated with high levels of discomfort when optimal palliative care is provided 1
- There is little correlation between sensation of thirst and actual fluid intake (even IV) in terminal patients 1
- The 2024 ESPEN guidelines on dementia explicitly state: "Enteral and parenteral nutrition and parenteral fluids shall NOT be initiated in persons with dementia in the terminal phase of life" 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not confuse a reversible acute illness (pneumonia, UTI, gastroenteritis) with the terminal phase—the former may benefit from temporary hydration 1, 2
- Do not assume that parenteral fluids will relieve thirst in dying patients—mouth care is more effective 1
- Do not use hypodermoclysis as a long-term solution or to reduce nursing workload 1
- Do not initiate artificial hydration based solely on family distress without clear medical indication and patient benefit 1