TME Grading in Rectal Cancer
TME grading is a critical quality control measure that directly predicts local recurrence risk and overall oncologic outcomes—it serves as the single most important pathologic assessment of surgical quality in rectal cancer resection. 1
The Three-Tier TME Grading System
The quality of mesorectal excision is graded according to the plane of surgical dissection achieved 1:
Complete (Mesorectal Plane - Grade 3)
- Intact mesorectum with only minor irregularities of a smooth mesorectal surface 1
- No defect deeper than 5 mm 1
- No coning (distal tapering indicating suboptimal dissection) 1
- Smooth circumferential resection margin on slicing 1
- This represents optimal surgical quality and is associated with the lowest local recurrence rates 2
Nearly Complete (Intramesorectal Plane - Grade 2)
- Moderate bulk to mesorectum with irregularities of the mesorectal surface 1
- Moderate distal coning present 1
- Muscularis propria not visible except at levator insertion 1
- Moderate irregularities of circumferential resection margin 1
Incomplete (Muscularis Propria Plane - Grade 1)
- Little bulk to mesorectum with defects down onto muscularis propria 1
- Very irregular circumferential resection margin 1
- This grade is associated with significantly increased local recurrence risk 3
Clinical Significance and Impact on Outcomes
The quality of TME execution is the single most critical factor determining oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. 2 The European Society for Medical Oncology emphasizes that complete excision of the entire mesorectal envelope with sharp dissection along the avascular plane between the mesorectal fascia and presacral fascia is mandatory. 2
Relationship to Local Recurrence
- Complete or nearly complete TME achieves local recurrence rates of 3-7% in curative resections 2
- Incomplete TME (muscularis propria plane) significantly increases recurrence risk regardless of adjuvant therapy 3
- Studies show that 91-99% of optimally performed TME specimens achieve complete or near-complete grades 4, 5
Assessment Requirements
The specimen must be examined both as a whole (fresh) and as cross-sectional slices (fixed) to make adequate interpretation. 1 A TME specimen ideally should have a smooth surface, without incisions, defects or cracks, as an indication of successful surgical excision of all mesorectal tissue. 1
Critical Quality Control Measures
Surgeon and/or pathologist evaluation of mesorectal specimen quality is a mandatory quality control measure. 2 The European Society for Medical Oncology recommends photographic documentation and standardized pathologic reporting. 6
Important Caveat About Grading Accuracy
Recent multicenter trial data reveals a 14% rate of major discordance between site and central pathology reviewers in TME grading, with reconciliation resulting in major grade changes in 5% of cases. 7 This suggests that reported rates of TME completeness are likely overestimated in clinical practice. 7 Central review of TME photographs and reconciliation of major discordances is strongly recommended for quality assurance. 7
Integration with Treatment Planning
Impact on Adjuvant Therapy Decisions
- Poor quality TME (muscularis propria plane) is an indication for postoperative chemoradiotherapy if preoperative radiotherapy was not given, regardless of other pathologic features 3
- The quality of TME specimen must be documented alongside circumferential resection margin status (positive if <1mm) when determining need for additional therapy 3
- At least 12 lymph nodes must be examined to accurately stage as N0—fewer examined nodes combined with poor TME quality represents high-risk understaging 3
Factors Influencing TME Quality
Male gender and abdominoperineal resection (versus anterior resection) are associated with lower TME quality scores, though these factors do not preclude achieving optimal results with meticulous technique. 8 Circumferential resection margin positivity correlates with poorer TME grades. 8
The TME grade serves as both a measure of technical surgical performance and a predictor of oncologic outcomes—it should be routinely documented in all rectal cancer resection specimens and used to guide postoperative treatment decisions. 1, 2, 3