Is a US (Ultrasound) abdominal the best initial diagnostic test for a patient with severe epigastric pain, soft abdomen, and a history of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Abdominal Ultrasound for Severe Epigastric Pain

For a patient with severe epigastric pain and soft abdomen, abdominal ultrasound is a reasonable initial imaging modality, but CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast is generally superior and should be strongly considered, especially if ultrasound is non-diagnostic or clinical suspicion remains high. 1

Initial Imaging Strategy

CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast is the preferred initial imaging for non-localized or epigastric abdominal pain in adults because it provides comprehensive evaluation of multiple potential etiologies and has superior diagnostic accuracy compared to ultrasound. 1 The ACR Appropriateness Criteria specifically recommend CT with IV contrast as "usually appropriate" for non-localized abdominal pain, which includes epigastric presentations. 1

However, ultrasound can serve as an effective initial screening tool in select circumstances, particularly when specific conditions are suspected:

  • Ultrasound is the primary modality for suspected acute cholecystitis and other hepatobiliary causes of epigastric pain. 2, 3
  • US can rapidly evaluate for biliary disease, liver pathology, and pancreatic abnormalities at the bedside in the emergency setting. 3
  • Emergency bedside ultrasound is rapid, non-invasive, and can provide immediate diagnostic information for common epigastric pain etiologies. 3

Limitations of Ultrasound in This Context

Ultrasound has significant limitations that must be considered:

  • US is operator-dependent and requires substantial expertise, with estimates suggesting 500 examinations needed for competency. 4
  • Ultrasound accuracy is diminished in obese patients, which is particularly relevant in the United States population. 4
  • US is less likely to identify alternative diagnoses compared to CT, with sensitivity for alternate diagnoses ranging 33-78% for US versus 50-100% for CT. 1
  • Overlying bowel gas and patient body habitus can significantly limit visualization of deeper abdominal structures. 1

Recommended Algorithmic Approach

For your patient with severe epigastric pain and soft abdomen:

  1. If biliary pathology is strongly suspected clinically (right upper quadrant tenderness, Murphy's sign, jaundice), start with ultrasound as it is the primary modality for cholecystitis. 2, 3

  2. If the clinical picture is less specific or multiple etiologies are possible, proceed directly to CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast for comprehensive evaluation. 1

  3. If ultrasound is performed first and is non-diagnostic or negative but clinical suspicion remains, proceed immediately to CT rather than repeating ultrasound. 1

  4. Consider the patient's age and comorbidities: The history of Ankylosing Spondylitis may be a red herring, but older patients or those with atypical presentations benefit more from CT's comprehensive evaluation. 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not rely solely on ultrasound when:

  • The patient is obese or has significant bowel gas limiting acoustic windows. 4
  • Multiple potential diagnoses need to be excluded (pancreatitis, perforation, mesenteric ischemia, aortic pathology). 1
  • The clinical presentation is severe or suggests potential surgical pathology. 1

Do not delay definitive imaging with CT if ultrasound is equivocal, as this can delay diagnosis and appropriate management. 1 The soft abdomen in your patient does not exclude serious pathology, and severe pain warrants thorough investigation.

Special Considerations for Ankylosing Spondylitis

While the patient's AS history is noted, there is no specific evidence suggesting AS changes the imaging approach for acute epigastric pain. The standard algorithm based on pain characteristics and suspected pathology should guide imaging selection. 1

In summary: CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast provides the most comprehensive evaluation for severe epigastric pain with uncertain etiology, while ultrasound is appropriate as initial imaging only when biliary pathology is specifically suspected or as a rapid bedside screening tool with the understanding that CT will likely follow if non-diagnostic. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Ultrasound for Diagnosing Diverticulitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.