What is the most critical test to perform on a diabetic patient with a well-demarcated plantar foot ulcer, nearly diminished sensation, and inability to perceive touch?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Monofilament Test (Answer: B)

The monofilament test is the most critical test to perform in this clinical scenario, as it objectively confirms loss of protective sensation (LOPS), which is the primary diagnostic finding needed to establish the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcer and guide subsequent management. 1, 2

Why Monofilament Testing is the Answer

The clinical presentation already strongly suggests LOPS based on history ("nearly diminished sensation" and "unable to perceive touch"), but objective confirmation with the 10-g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test is essential for formal diagnosis and risk stratification rather than relying on subjective history alone. 2

Key Diagnostic Principles

  • The monofilament test is explicitly designed to diagnose LOPS rather than early neuropathy, making it the primary diagnostic tool for this exact clinical scenario of an established plantar ulcer with suspected sensory loss. 1, 2

  • LOPS is present in 78% of diabetic patients with foot ulcers, and the monofilament test is one of the two most sensitive tests for identifying feet at risk for ulceration. 2, 3

  • Absent monofilament sensation definitively confirms LOPS, while normal results (at least two normal tests with no abnormal tests) rule it out. 1, 2

Proper Testing Technique

  • The monofilament should be applied perpendicular to the skin surface with sufficient force to cause buckling, held for approximately 2 seconds, and tested at three sites on each foot. 1

  • Apply the filament along the perimeter of the ulcer, not on the ulcer itself, callus, scar, or necrotic tissue. 1

  • Ideally combine with at least one additional neurological assessment (pinprick, temperature, vibration with 128-Hz tuning fork, or ankle reflexes) to confirm the diagnosis. 1, 2

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

ABI (Ankle-Brachial Index) - Option A

  • ABI testing is indicated for evaluating peripheral arterial disease (PAD), not for diagnosing the underlying cause of a neuropathic ulcer. 2

  • The clinical presentation describes a well-demarcated plantar ulcer with central erythema and signs of healing, which is the classic appearance of a neuropathic ulcer from pressure and trauma, not an ischemic ulcer. 4

  • ABI should only be performed if the patient has symptoms of claudication, decreased walking speed, leg fatigue, or absent/decreased pedal pulses on initial screening. 1, 5

Pressure Assessment - Option D

  • While pressure assessment becomes relevant after confirming LOPS through monofilament testing, it is part of the treatment strategy (therapeutic footwear, offloading) rather than the diagnostic workup. 2

  • The presence of LOPS must be objectively documented first, as this fundamentally changes management to require specialized footwear, more frequent monitoring, and referral to foot care specialists. 2

Clinical Impact of Confirming LOPS

  • Patients with documented LOPS require immediate risk stratification and specialized preventive care, including referral to foot care specialists for ongoing preventive care and lifelong surveillance. 2, 5

  • The diagnosis triggers specific management interventions: specialized therapeutic footwear with demonstrated pressure relief, more frequent monitoring intervals (every 1-3 months rather than annually), and multidisciplinary team involvement. 1, 5

  • The inability to feel a 5.07 monofilament represents a sensory threshold more than 50 times greater than normal, meaning roughly 98% of sensory ability has been lost, underscoring the critical nature of objective documentation. 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosing Loss of Protective Sensation in Diabetic Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Diabetic Foot Care Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Sensory thresholds of normal human feet.

Foot & ankle international, 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.