What is the comparison between image-guided Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) and Mohs surgery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Mohs micrographic surgery is the preferred treatment for high-risk basal cell carcinoma due to its high cure rates of 98-99% and ability to preserve normal tissue, as supported by the most recent and highest quality study 1.

Comparison of Treatments

Image-guided Superficial Radiation Therapy (SRT) and Mohs micrographic surgery are both effective treatments for non-melanoma skin cancers, but they serve different purposes and have distinct advantages.

  • Mohs surgery is generally considered the gold standard for high-risk skin cancers, particularly in cosmetically sensitive areas like the face.
  • Image-guided SRT is a non-invasive alternative that uses low-energy radiation to destroy cancer cells over multiple sessions.

Key Considerations

  • The choice between these treatments should be individualized based on tumor location and type, patient preferences, medical history, and cosmetic considerations.
  • Patients should discuss both options with their dermatologist to determine the most appropriate treatment for their specific situation, considering the cure rates, potential side effects, and impact on quality of life, as highlighted in studies such as 1 and 1.

Treatment Outcomes

  • Mohs surgery has cure rates of 98-99% for high-risk basal cell carcinoma, as reported in studies like 1 and 1.
  • Image-guided SRT has cure rates ranging from 90-98% depending on tumor characteristics, although the provided evidence does not directly compare SRT to Mohs surgery for basal cell carcinoma, studies such as 1 and 1 discuss the efficacy of radiosurgery in other contexts.

From the Research

Image-Guided SRT vs. Mohs

  • There are no direct studies comparing image-guided SRT (Stereotactic Radiosurgery) to Mohs surgery in the provided evidence.
  • However, the studies provide information on the effectiveness of Mohs surgery and radiation therapy for skin cancers, including basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
  • A study published in 2020 2 reviews surgical treatment guidelines and data for standard local excision versus Mohs' surgery for cutaneous nonmelanoma and melanoma skin cancer.
  • Another study from 2020 3 provides guidelines for the use of definitive and postoperative radiation therapy in patients with basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Studies from 2018 4 and 2021 5 analyze the characteristics and outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, highlighting the differences between the two types of tumors and the importance of patient and tumor risk stratification.
  • A 2014 study 6 evaluates the efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery for basosquamous carcinoma and metatypical basal cell carcinoma, showing high recurrence-free survival rates.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.