What were the design, dosing schedule, and outcomes of the phase I/II trial of brentuximab vedotin (BV) combined with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) administered every three weeks in adult patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma after prior therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

BV-ICE Regimen: Study Design and Outcomes

Phase I/II Trial Design

The BV-ICE combination was evaluated in a phase I/II study where brentuximab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg) was administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle combined with standard ICE chemotherapy (ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) for 2 cycles in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. 1

Study Population and Dosing Schedule

  • The phase I portion enrolled 10 patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose, finding no dose-limiting toxicities and establishing BV 1.8 mg/kg as the recommended phase II dose 1
  • The phase II portion enrolled 42 patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma after prior therapy 1
  • BV was administered at 1.8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle 1
  • ICE chemotherapy was given on days 1-3 using standard dosing 1
  • Patients received 2 cycles of BV-ICE before response assessment 1

Primary Outcomes

  • Complete metabolic response (CMR) rate after 2 cycles was 61.9% (26 of 42 patients), which was the primary endpoint 1
  • Overall response rate reached 88% when including partial responses 1
  • 88% of patients (37 of 42) successfully proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation 1

Long-Term Survival Data

  • With median follow-up of 38 months, the 3-year progression-free survival was 64.3% 1
  • The 3-year overall survival rate was 100%, indicating no deaths occurred during this follow-up period 1

Safety Profile

Hematologic Toxicity

  • Hematological toxicities occurred in 81% of patients and were the most frequent adverse events 1
  • Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 73% of patients 1
  • Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 80% of patients 1

Non-Hematologic Toxicity

  • Infections occurred in 21% of patients 1
  • Febrile neutropenia occurred in 9% of patients 1
  • Sepsis occurred in 13% of patients 1
  • One treatment-related death (2%) occurred due to multisystem organ failure 1

Alternative Dosing Schedule: Dose-Dense BV-ICE

A separate phase I/II study evaluated a dose-dense schedule where BV was administered on both days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle at either 1.2 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg, with the recommended phase 2 dose established at 1.5 mg/kg 2. This dose-dense approach achieved a 74% complete response rate after two cycles in 43 evaluable patients 2.

Clinical Context from Guidelines

Position in Treatment Algorithm

  • NCCN guidelines recognize ICE as one of the most commonly used salvage regimens for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma before high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant 3
  • Multiple studies have investigated incorporating brentuximab vedotin into initial salvage therapy to increase complete response rates before transplant 3
  • The combination approach aims to achieve higher rates of PET-negative responses, which is the most important predictor of post-transplant outcomes 3

Comparison to Other BV Combinations

  • BV-ICE demonstrated similar or superior activity compared to other BV-containing salvage regimens (BV-DHAP, BV-bendamustine, BV-ESHAP) that achieved PET-negative response rates of 75-90% 3
  • The advantage of BV-ICE is rapid administration over just 2 cycles compared to longer durations required for other combinations 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.