What percentage of individuals have a variant lumbar‑sacral plexus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Anatomical Variations of the Lumbosacral Plexus

Anatomical variations of the lumbosacral plexus are extremely common, occurring in approximately 41-50% of individuals based on cadaveric dissection studies.

Prevalence of Variations

The frequency of anatomical variants in the lumbosacral plexus is substantial and clinically significant:

  • Overall variation rate ranges from 41-50% when examining the entire lumbosacral plexus complex 1
  • Lumbar plexus variations occur in approximately 20% of individuals on average, with individual nerve variations ranging from 8.8% to 47.1% depending on the specific nerve examined 2
  • Sacral plexus variations were documented in 41 of 100 examined plexi (41%) in one comprehensive cadaveric study 1

Specific Common Variations

Lumbar Plexus Variations

The most frequently encountered anatomical variants include:

  • Double ascension of the L4 root from the intervertebral foramen occurs in 25% of cases, with plexiform ascension in an additional 5% 1
  • Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve variations occur in up to 47.1% of cases, representing the highest variation rate among lumbar plexus branches 2
  • Accessory obturator nerve is present in approximately 12% of individuals 3
  • Absence of the iliohypogastric nerve occurs in a small percentage of cases 2
  • Early bifurcation of the genitofemoral nerve into genital and femoral branches is commonly observed 2

Sacral Plexus Variations

  • Double ascension of the L5 root occurs in 8% of cases, with plexiform ascension in 4% 1
  • Double S1 root at ascension from sacral foramina is present in 16% of cases 1
  • Double S2 root occurs in 8% of cases 1
  • Thickened lumbosacral trunk is observed in 19% of individuals 1

Clinical Implications

These variations have direct clinical relevance:

  • Anatomical variations can complicate regional anesthesia techniques, particularly lumbar plexus blocks, as the relationship between nerve branches and the psoas muscle varies 3
  • Nerve entrapment syndromes may result from anatomical variants, such as piriformis syndrome where the sciatic nerve is compressed due to anatomic variation 4
  • Surgical planning requires awareness of these variations to avoid iatrogenic nerve injury during pelvic and spinal procedures 1
  • MRI interpretation must account for normal anatomical variants to avoid misdiagnosis of pathology 5

Important Caveats

  • The reported prevalence of specific variations shows wide discrepancies across studies 2, likely due to differences in dissection techniques, sample sizes, and classification systems
  • Bilateral symmetry cannot be assumed, as variations may be unilateral 1
  • The presence of anatomical variations does not necessarily correlate with clinical symptoms unless compression or entrapment occurs 4

References

Research

Anatomical variations of lumbosacral plexus.

Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2010

Research

Anatomy and anaesthesia of the lumbar somatic plexus.

Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2004

Guideline

Lumbosacral Plexopathy Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

MR Imaging of the Lumbosacral Plexus: A Review of Techniques and Pathologies.

Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.