What is the difference between Mohs surgery and Superficial Radiation Therapy (SRT)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Mohs surgery is the recommended treatment for most non-melanoma skin cancers, particularly in cosmetically sensitive areas like the face, due to its high cure rates and tissue-sparing approach. This is based on the most recent and highest quality study available, which reported a 5-year local recurrence rate of 3.1% for primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) 1. In comparison, other treatment modalities such as curettage and electrodesiccation (C&E), standard excision, and radiation therapy had higher recurrence rates.

Key Considerations

  • Mohs surgery involves removing thin layers of cancer-containing skin and examining them until only cancer-free tissue remains, providing immediate confirmation of complete removal.
  • Superficial Radiation Therapy (SRT) is typically recommended for patients who are poor surgical candidates due to age, medical comorbidities, use of blood thinners, or personal preference to avoid surgery.
  • SRT uses low-energy radiotherapy delivered directly to the skin cancer over multiple sessions, with good cure rates (90-95%), but requires multiple office visits and may cause skin changes like redness or hypopigmentation over time.
  • The choice between Mohs surgery and SRT should be individualized based on cancer type and location, patient health status, and personal preferences after discussion with a dermatologist who can evaluate the specific characteristics of the skin cancer.

Evidence-Based Recommendations

  • The work group recommends MMS for the treatment of high-risk cSCC (on the basis of NCCN risk stratification) 1.
  • A systematic review of the literature since 1940 reported a 5-year local recurrence rate of 3.1% for primary cSCC treated with MMS, compared to 3.7% for C&E, 8.1% for standard excision, and 10.0% for radiation therapy 1.
  • For recurrent cSCC, the meta-analysis by Rowe et al revealed a 5-year recurrence rate after MMS of 10.0%, compared to 23.3% following standard excision 1.

From the Research

Mohs vs SRT: Treatment Options for Skin Cancer

  • Mohs micrographic surgery is a surgical technique used to treat skin cancer, particularly basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) 2, 3, 4.
  • Superficial Radiation Therapy (SRT) is a non-surgical treatment option for skin cancer, which uses low-energy X-rays to target cancer cells 5.
  • The choice between Mohs surgery and SRT depends on various factors, including the type and size of the tumor, location, and patient's overall health 5, 3.
  • Mohs surgery is often recommended for high-risk lesions or those in sensitive areas, while SRT may be suitable for patients who are not surgical candidates or have a high risk of surgical complications 5, 3.

Indications for Mohs Surgery

  • Mohs surgery is indicated for BCC and cSCC lesions that are high-risk or located in sensitive areas, such as the face or ears 2, 3, 4.
  • It is also recommended for lesions that have a high risk of recurrence or have already recurred 3, 4.

Indications for SRT

  • SRT is indicated for patients with BCC or cSCC who are not surgical candidates or have a high risk of surgical complications 5.
  • It may also be used as an adjuvant therapy after surgical excision to reduce the risk of recurrence 5.

Comparison of Mohs Surgery and SRT

  • Both Mohs surgery and SRT have high cure rates for skin cancer, but the choice between the two depends on individual patient factors 2, 5, 3, 4.
  • Mohs surgery has the advantage of providing a high cure rate with minimal tissue loss, while SRT has the advantage of being a non-surgical option with minimal downtime 5, 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.