What are the common insertion‑site complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients over 65 years old with hypertension, atherosclerotic disease, or on anticoagulation, and how should each be managed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Insertion Site Complications Following EVAR

Access site complications occur in 2-6% of EVAR procedures, with the most critical being hemorrhage (including retroperitoneal), pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, arterial thrombosis/occlusion, and limb ischemia—all requiring immediate recognition and intervention to prevent limb loss or death. 1, 2

Common Insertion Site Complications and Their Management

Hemorrhage and Hematoma

Access site bleeding is the most frequent complication, presenting as expanding groin hematoma or occult retroperitoneal hemorrhage. 1

  • Groin hematoma: Monitor for expansion; stable hematomas can be managed conservatively with observation. 1
  • Retroperitoneal hemorrhage: Suspect when patient develops hypotension, suprainguinal tenderness, severe back pain, or lower-quadrant abdominal pain despite stable groin appearance. 1
    • Confirm diagnosis with CT imaging immediately. 1
    • Over 80% can be managed conservatively with transfusions and reversal of anticoagulation; surgery reserved for hemodynamic instability. 1
    • Monitor hematocrit for drops >5-6% absolute. 1

Pseudoaneurysm

Pseudoaneurysms occur in 0.1-0.2% of diagnostic procedures and 3.5-5.5% of interventional procedures, though physical examination alone misses >60% of cases. 2

  • Clinical presentation: Pulsatile mass at puncture site, though can be clinically silent; always palpate for pulsatile mass. 2
  • Diagnostic approach: Obtain duplex ultrasound for any clinical suspicion—physical exam is unreliable. 2
  • Management algorithm: 2
    • <2.0 cm: Conservative management with ultrasound follow-up at 1 month (61% resolve spontaneously within 7-52 days; 90% that will close do so within 2 months)
    • ≥2.0 cm or persistent/recurrent: Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection (first-line) or compression therapy
    • Failed thrombin injection: Stent-graft deployment, particularly for large arterial defects or accompanying AVF 3

Arteriovenous Fistula

AVF formation occurs when both artery and vein are punctured, detected by continuous murmur over puncture site. 1, 2

  • Clinical signs: Continuous bruit, potential high-output heart failure in rare cases. 1
  • Management: Stent-graft implantation is highly effective, even when located close to femoral bifurcation. 3
  • Critical caveat: Avoid repeat use of same access site—risk of enlarging fistula, inadvertent venous access, and hemostasis complications. 1

Arterial Thrombosis and Limb Occlusion

Limb ischemia complicates 9% of EVAR procedures, with limb occlusions accounting for 71% of these cases. 4

  • Presentation spectrum: 4

    • Severe acute arterial ischemia (most urgent)
    • Rest pain
    • Intermittent claudication
    • Decreased/absent femoral pulse
  • Etiologies: 5, 4

    • Graft limb occlusion (most common—71%)
    • Distal embolization (15%)
    • Common femoral artery thrombosis (15%)
  • Management by severity: 4, 3

    • Acute severe ischemia: Immediate thrombectomy with stent placement or femorofemoral bypass
    • Embolization/CFA injury: Emergent embolectomy followed by femoral endarterectomy and patch angioplasty or interposition graft
    • Iliofemoral thrombosis: Catheter-directed thrombolysis followed by prolonged balloon inflation or stent placement 3
    • Mild claudication: Expectant management acceptable if symptoms improving 4

Arterial Dissection or Perforation

Vessel injury from delivery system or improper puncture technique can cause dissection or perforation. 1, 5

  • Obstructive dissection flaps in CFA: Prolonged balloon inflation; if extending to iliac arteries, deploy self-expanding stents. 3
  • Active bleeding/perforation: Prompt stent-graft placement at leakage site is lifesaving. 3

Arterial Closure Device Failure

Device failure contributes to access site complications, potentially causing bleeding or arterial occlusion requiring emergent intervention. 1

  • Management: May require emergent endarterectomy to remove device. 1
  • Alternative complications: Stenoses and occlusions from closure devices can be treated with balloon angioplasty and catheter-directed thrombolysis. 3

Localized Infection and Ecchymosis

Infection and bruising at access site are less severe but require monitoring. 1

  • Simple ecchymosis without swelling: Reassure patient if no pulsatile mass, symmetric pulses, and no expanding hematoma. 2
  • Infection: Requires antibiotics; if involving endograft, may necessitate explantation. 6

High-Risk Patient Factors

Your patient population (>65 years, hypertension, atherosclerotic disease, anticoagulation) represents the highest-risk group for access complications. 1, 2

Key predictors include: 1, 2

  • Age ≥70 years
  • Female sex
  • Peripheral arterial disease (atherosclerotic disease)
  • Renal failure or creatinine ≥2 mg/dL
  • Anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy intensity
  • Body surface area ≤1.6 m² or BMI ≥28 kg/m²
  • Emergent procedures
  • Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use

Critical Post-Procedure Monitoring

Immediate assessment must include: 2

  • Bilateral pedal pulse palpation
  • Comparison of systolic Doppler blood pressures between legs
  • Continuous monitoring until femoral sheath removal for vasovagal responses
  • High-risk patients require continuous ECG monitoring ≥24 hours 2

Return precautions for patients: 2

  • New swelling at groin
  • Pulsatile mass
  • Pain, numbness, weakness
  • Color changes in leg
  • Any signs of limb ischemia

Technical Prevention Strategies

  • Proper puncture site location: Avoid "too low" (below CFA bifurcation) or "too high" (above superior pubic ramus—noncompressible) punctures. 1
  • Femoral angiogram verification: Standard practice to confirm appropriate puncture location. 1, 2
  • Ultrasound-guided access: Consider in high-risk patients to reduce complications. 2
  • Operator experience: Meticulous technique cannot be overemphasized. 1

Special Considerations for EVAR-Specific Complications

Female patients experience higher rates of both intraoperative and early postoperative vascular complications due to smaller vessel caliber. 5

Adjunctive vascular procedures to iliofemoral arteries are frequently necessary during EVAR to repair delivery system damage or provide adequate conduit when access arteries are inadequate. 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Complications of Femoral Artery Catheterization

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Endovascular treatment of complications of femoral arterial access.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.