How can I rapidly exclude pulmonary embolism in the emergency department using a simple scoring system?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Rapid Exclusion of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department

Use the Wells score or revised Geneva score to stratify clinical probability, then apply D-dimer testing (with age-adjusted cutoffs for patients >50 years) to safely exclude PE without imaging in low-to-intermediate probability patients. 1

Step 1: Apply PERC Rule for Very Low-Risk Patients

Before formal scoring, consider the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC) for patients with low clinical suspicion. All eight criteria must be met to safely exclude PE without any testing: 1

  • Age <50 years
  • Pulse <100 bpm
  • Oxygen saturation >94%
  • No hemoptysis
  • No estrogen use
  • No prior DVT/PE
  • No unilateral leg swelling
  • No surgery/trauma requiring hospitalization within 4 weeks

If all PERC criteria are met, PE is excluded with 99.1% negative predictive value and no further workup is needed. 2 However, PERC should only be applied in patients with genuinely low clinical suspicion—never in moderate or high probability patients. 3

Step 2: Calculate Clinical Probability Score

Revised Geneva Score (Fully Objective)

This is the most standardized approach as it requires no clinical judgment: 1

Assign points for:

  • Previous PE or DVT: 3 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
  • Heart rate 75-94 bpm: 3 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
  • Heart rate ≥95 bpm: 5 points (original) or 2 points (simplified)
  • Surgery or fracture within past month: 2 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
  • Hemoptysis: 2 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
  • Active cancer: 2 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
  • Unilateral lower-limb pain: 3 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
  • Pain on deep venous palpation and unilateral edema: 4 points (original) or 1 point (simplified)
  • Age >65 years: 1 point (both versions) 1

Risk stratification:

  • Low probability: 0-3 points (original) or 0-1 (simplified) = ~10% PE prevalence
  • Intermediate probability: 4-10 points (original) or 2-4 (simplified) = ~30% PE prevalence
  • High probability: ≥11 points (original) or ≥5 (simplified) = ~65% PE prevalence 1

Wells Score (Alternative)

The Wells score performs similarly to Geneva but includes subjective clinical judgment: 4

  • Clinical signs of DVT: 3 points
  • PE as likely or more likely than alternative diagnosis: 3 points
  • Heart rate >100 bpm: 1.5 points
  • Immobilization ≥3 days or surgery within 4 weeks: 1.5 points
  • Previous PE/DVT: 1.5 points
  • Hemoptysis: 1 point
  • Malignancy: 1 point 1, 4

Dichotomized interpretation:

  • PE unlikely: ≤4 points = ~12% PE prevalence
  • PE likely: >4 points = ~30% PE prevalence 1, 4

Step 3: D-Dimer Testing Strategy

For Low or Intermediate Probability Patients

Obtain high-sensitivity D-dimer using age-adjusted cutoffs for patients >50 years old: 1

  • Standard cutoff: <500 ng/mL excludes PE
  • Age-adjusted cutoff: Age × 10 ng/mL for patients >50 years (e.g., 700 ng/mL for a 70-year-old)

The age-adjusted approach increases the proportion of patients in whom PE can be excluded from 6.4% to 30% without additional false-negative findings. 1, 3

If D-dimer is negative by these thresholds, PE is excluded with 99.5% negative predictive value and no imaging is needed. 4, 5

Critical Caveat About D-Dimer

Do NOT use D-dimer in high clinical probability patients—a normal result does not safely exclude PE even with highly sensitive assays. 1 D-dimer also has extremely limited utility in hospitalized patients, where fewer than 10% will have negative results due to comorbid conditions, recent surgery, infection, and inflammation. 3

Step 4: Imaging for Positive D-Dimer or High Probability

Proceed directly to CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) without D-dimer testing in high probability patients or when D-dimer is elevated. 1, 3

CTPA has >95% sensitivity for segmental or larger emboli and 96% specificity. 3 A normal CTPA in low or intermediate probability patients definitively excludes PE without further testing. 1

Complete Algorithm Summary

  1. Very low suspicion: Apply PERC rule → if all 8 criteria met, stop (no PE) 1
  2. Low/intermediate probability (Wells ≤4 or Geneva 0-10): Check age-adjusted D-dimer 1
    • If negative → stop (no PE) 5
    • If positive → CTPA 1, 3
  3. High probability (Wells >4 or Geneva ≥11): Skip D-dimer, proceed directly to CTPA 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Never apply PERC in patients with moderate-to-high clinical probability—it was designed only for genuinely low-risk patients. 3 The PERC rule may miss up to 8% of confirmed PEs even in "PE unlikely" patients, so use cautiously. 2

Never rely on D-dimer alone in hospitalized patients or those with active cancer, recent surgery, or inflammatory conditions—proceed directly to imaging in these populations. 1, 3

Do not use clinical gestalt without structured scoring unless you are highly experienced—formal prediction rules standardize the approach and reduce missed diagnoses. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 2018

Guideline

Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Pulmonary Embolism Assessment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.