What is the next step in evaluating a patient with ocular‑only ptosis suspected of myasthenia gravis who has a negative single‑fiber electromyography and negative anti‑acetylcholine‑receptor antibodies?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 7, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Next Diagnostic Step: Anti-MuSK Antibody Testing

With negative single-fiber EMG and negative anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies in a patient with suspected ocular myasthenia gravis, you should immediately order anti-muscle-specific kinase (anti-MuSK) antibodies, as approximately one-third of seronegative patients will be MuSK-positive. 1, 2

Rationale for Anti-MuSK Testing

  • Anti-MuSK antibodies must be tested when AChR antibodies are negative, as this represents the next most important diagnostic step in the serological workup 3
  • The pooled analysis shows 5% positivity for anti-MuSK in ocular myasthenia gravis patients, making this a clinically meaningful subset to identify 4
  • A stepwise approach is recommended where anti-MuSK is ordered only if the initial anti-AChR returns negative, given the relatively low prevalence and higher cost of anti-MuSK testing 4

Additional Serological Testing to Consider

  • Anti-lipoprotein-related protein 4 (LRP4) antibodies should also be considered, as LRP4 has been associated with both generalized and ocular myasthenia gravis 1
  • Anti-striated muscle antibodies should be included in the workup if not already performed 2, 3

Critical Diagnostic Considerations

  • The negative single-fiber EMG is unusual and concerning, as SFEMG has >90% sensitivity for ocular myasthenia and is considered the gold standard 1, 2, 3
  • This raises the possibility of either:
    • Technical issues with the SFEMG (operator-dependent test requiring specialized equipment and expertise) 2
    • Alternative diagnosis requiring reconsideration
    • True seronegative myasthenia gravis

Clinical Testing to Perform Now

  • Ice pack test should be performed if not already done—apply ice pack over closed eyes for 2 minutes for ptosis or 5 minutes for strabismus, looking for reduction of ptosis by approximately 2mm or reduction of misalignment 1, 2, 3
  • This test is highly specific for myasthenia gravis and can provide immediate diagnostic support 1, 2
  • Rest test without ice pack can also aid in diagnosis 1

Edrophonium (Tensilon) Test Consideration

  • Edrophonium testing may be considered but requires experienced practitioners with proper intravenous administration capability 1
  • The test has 86% sensitivity for ocular myasthenia 1
  • Must be performed in a monitored setting with atropine available (0.4-0.5 mg IV) for potential muscarinic side effects including excess tearing, salivation, sweating, abdominal cramping, bradycardia, bronchospasm, hypotension, and syncope 1, 5
  • Dosing: Prepare 1 mL (10 mg) in tuberculin syringe, inject 0.2 mL (2 mg) IV over 15-30 seconds, wait 45 seconds, then inject remaining 0.8 mL (8 mg) if no reaction occurs 5

Imaging and Supplementary Workup

  • CT chest with contrast must be ordered after diagnosis confirmation to evaluate for thymoma, which occurs in 10-20% of AChR-positive patients 3
  • Even with negative AChR antibodies, chest imaging is warranted given the clinical suspicion 3
  • Brain imaging may help exclude brainstem lesions that can mimic myasthenia gravis 2

Empiric Treatment Consideration

  • If clinical suspicion remains high despite negative testing, empiric trial of pyridostigmine starting at 30 mg orally three times daily can be both diagnostic and therapeutic 2, 3
  • Response to treatment can confirm the diagnosis in seronegative patients who are clinically likely to have ocular myasthenia gravis 6
  • Approximately 50% of patients with ocular myasthenia show minimal response to pyridostigmine alone, which does not rule out the diagnosis 1, 2

Important Caveats

  • Approximately 50% of patients with purely ocular myasthenia are seronegative for AChR antibodies, so negative antibodies do not exclude the diagnosis 1, 7
  • The combination of negative SFEMG and negative AChR antibodies is atypical and warrants careful reconsideration of the differential diagnosis 1, 2
  • Consider alternative diagnoses including third nerve palsy (check for pupillary involvement), thyroid eye disease (check for proptosis, lid retraction, forced duction testing), chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia, and orbital pathology 2

Monitoring Strategy

  • Regular assessment is crucial as 50-80% of patients with initial ocular symptoms develop generalized myasthenia within a few years, typically within the first 2 years 2, 3, 8
  • Pulmonary function testing with negative inspiratory force (NIF) and vital capacity (VC) should be performed to assess for subclinical respiratory muscle involvement 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Options for Myasthenia Gravis (MG)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Myasthenia Gravis Diagnostic and Management Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The Diagnostic Yield of Antiacetylcholine Receptor Antibodies Versus Antimuscle Kinase Antibodies in Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Meta-Analysis.

Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, 2025

Research

The Usefulness of Anti-acetylcholine Receptor Binding Antibody Testing in Diagnosing Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.

Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, 2021

Research

Ocular myasthenia gravis. A critical review of clinical and pathophysiological aspects.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 1993

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.