In a focused cardiovascular assessment of a patient with hypertension, should the carotid arteries be auscultated for bruits?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 7, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Carotid Artery Auscultation in Hypertensive Patients

Yes, you should routinely auscultate the carotid arteries in all patients with hypertension during a focused cardiovascular assessment. This is explicitly recommended by the European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology guidelines, which state that all hypertensive patients should undergo auscultation of the carotid arteries, and any detected murmurs should trigger further investigation with carotid ultrasound 1.

Why This Matters in Hypertension

The rationale for routine carotid auscultation in hypertensive patients is multifold:

  • Screening for secondary hypertension: Carotid bruits may indicate vascular abnormalities that could contribute to or complicate hypertension management 1.

  • Assessment of target organ damage: The physical examination aims to identify organ damage related to hypertension, and carotid artery disease represents vascular end-organ damage 1.

  • Marker of systemic atherosclerosis: While carotid bruits correlate more closely with systemic atherosclerosis than with focal carotid stenosis, this makes them valuable for overall cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertensive patients 1.

  • Increased cerebrovascular risk: Meta-analysis data shows that patients with carotid bruits have significantly elevated risk—4-fold increased risk for transient ischemic attack (rate ratio 4.00,95% CI 1.8-9.0), 2.5-fold increased risk for stroke (rate ratio 2.5,95% CI 1.8-3.5), and 2.7-fold increased risk for stroke death (rate ratio 2.7,95% CI 1.33-5.53) 2.

How to Perform the Assessment

Technique: Auscultate both carotid arteries systematically during the physical examination 1.

What to listen for: Any systolic murmurs over the carotid arteries should be documented 1.

Bilateral assessment: Check both sides, as the presence of bruits may be unilateral or bilateral 1.

What to Do If You Detect a Bruit

Immediate action: Any detected carotid murmur should prompt further investigation with carotid duplex ultrasonography 1, 3.

Diagnostic workup: Carotid duplex ultrasonography is the initial imaging modality of choice, with 90% sensitivity and 94% specificity for identifying clinically significant stenosis (>70%) 3.

Risk stratification: The presence of a bruit warrants evaluation for other manifestations of atherosclerotic disease, as these patients are at increased risk of cardiac events 3.

Important Caveats

Limited sensitivity: The sensitivity of carotid bruit detection for hemodynamically significant stenosis is only 56%, with a 44% false-negative rate, meaning absence of a bruit does not exclude carotid stenosis 4.

Not a screening tool for general population: While routine auscultation is recommended for hypertensive patients, carotid duplex ultrasonography is not recommended for routine screening of asymptomatic patients without risk factors 1.

Consider high-risk features: In hypertensive patients with additional risk factors (age >65 years, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, family history of early atherosclerosis), ultrasonography may be appropriate regardless of auscultation findings 1.

Positive predictive value is low: Only 25% of patients with carotid bruits have hemodynamically significant stenosis, but the finding still justifies further evaluation 4.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Carotid Artery Bruit in the Emergency Department

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What is the best treatment approach for an older adult patient with carotid bruit, hypertension, diabetes, and high cholesterol to reduce the risk of stroke?
What is the appropriate management and evaluation for a patient with a bruit, particularly those with risk factors for atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia?
What is the management approach for a patient presenting with a carotid bruit?
What is the significance of carotid bruits (sounds heard over the carotid artery with a stethoscope) in the absence of carotid artery stenosis (narrowing of the carotid artery) on Doppler ultrasound?
Are carotid bruits heard with the bell or diaphragm of a stethoscope?
How should a 70‑year‑old woman with grade III uterine prolapse and cystocele, decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis with massive ascites and bilateral hydroureteronephrosis be evaluated and managed, including etiology, clinical features, investigations, treatment options, prognosis, and potential complications?
In a patient with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome on 18.5 mg extended‑release methylphenidate, how does methylphenidate compare to amphetamine‑type stimulants in efficacy and cardiovascular safety?
Are bisphosphonates appropriate as an adjuvant for a patient with burning neuropathic pain and occasional shock‑like episodes?
How should a child presenting with new‑onset seizures, headache, focal neurologic deficits or signs of increased intracranial pressure and a history of pork exposure or travel to Taenia solium endemic regions be evaluated and managed for suspected neurocysticercosis?
Is functional electrical stimulation (FES) similar to a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device?
Is acute pyelonephritis considered a complicated urinary tract infection?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.