Evaluation and Management of Abdominal and Flank Edema (Suspected Ascites)
Perform diagnostic paracentesis immediately in all patients with new-onset moderate to severe ascites (Grade 2 or 3) to determine the underlying cause and guide management. 1, 2
Initial Physical Examination
Assess for ascites using shifting dullness, which has 83% sensitivity and 56% specificity and is the most practical bedside technique. 1
- Percuss the flanks first when abdominal swelling is observed 1
- To test for shifting dullness: percuss the abdomen to identify the tympany-dullness interface, then have the patient roll to one side and observe if the dullness shifts to the dependent side 1
- If no flank dullness is present, the patient has less than 10% chance of having ascites 1
- Flank dullness indicates approximately 1,500 mL of fluid must be present before detection 1
- The fluid wave test is more specific but less sensitive and more cumbersome than shifting dullness 1
Grade the Ascites Severity
- Grade 1: Detected only by ultrasound; not clinically evident 1
- Grade 2: Easily identified by visual inspection and palpation; moderate symmetrical distension 1
- Grade 3: Profound distension of the abdomen (massive or tense ascites) 1
Confirmatory Imaging
Order abdominal ultrasound if physical examination is inconclusive, as it can detect ascites when volume exceeds 100 mL. 1
Mandatory Diagnostic Paracentesis
Perform diagnostic paracentesis in all patients with new-onset Grade 2 or 3 ascites or those hospitalized for worsening ascites or any cirrhosis complication. 3, 1
Essential Paracentesis Studies
Obtain the following from ascitic fluid:
- Cell count with differential: Neutrophil count >250 cells/µL diagnoses spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) 3, 2
- Albumin concentration: Calculate serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) 3, 2
- Total protein concentration: Levels <1.5 g/dL indicate higher SBP risk 3, 2
- Culture: Inoculate at least 10 mL into blood culture bottles at bedside to enhance sensitivity 3, 2
- Triglyceride level: If fluid appears white/milky, measure triglycerides (>200 mg/dL confirms chylous ascites) 4
Paracentesis is safe with bleeding complications occurring in only about 1% of patients. 1
Interpret the SAAG to Determine Etiology
SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension with 97% diagnostic accuracy, distinguishing portal hypertension-related causes from non-portal hypertension causes. 2
Portal Hypertension-Related (SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL):
- Cirrhosis accounts for 75-85% of all ascites cases 1, 2
- Cardiac ascites (distinguish by checking jugular venous distension and measuring BNP/pro-BNP: median pro-BNP 6,100 pg/mL in heart failure vs 166 pg/mL in cirrhosis) 2
- Portal vein thrombosis 3
Non-Portal Hypertension (SAAG <1.1 g/dL):
- Malignancy (perform cytology) 3, 1
- Tuberculosis (check ascitic fluid PCR for mycobacteria, adenosine deaminase, consider laparoscopy with peritoneal biopsy if risk factors present) 2
- Pancreatic disease 3, 1
- Nephrotic syndrome 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely on physical examination alone for small volumes: Physical exam may miss ascites less than 1,500 mL 1
- Do not skip paracentesis: It is the most rapid and cost-effective diagnostic method 2
- Do not rely solely on fluid appearance: Turbid fluid can result from infection or tumor cells, not just chylous ascites, so always measure triglycerides if fluid appears milky 4
- Always inoculate blood culture bottles at bedside: This significantly enhances culture sensitivity for detecting SBP 3
Prognostic Implications and Referral
The development of ascites dramatically worsens prognosis, with 5-year survival dropping from 80% in compensated cirrhosis to 30% with ascites, and one to two-year mortality of 40-50%. 3, 2
All patients with new-onset ascites should be evaluated for liver transplantation, as this is the only intervention that improves survival in decompensated cirrhosis. 3, 2, 5