What type of X‑ray confirms nasogastric tube placement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Chest or Abdominal X-ray Confirms Nasogastric Tube Placement

Radiographic confirmation with either chest X-ray or abdominal X-ray is mandatory before initiating any feeding or medication administration through a nasogastric tube, as this remains the gold standard method with the highest reliability for confirming proper gastric position. 1, 2

Primary Verification Method

  • Obtain a chest X-ray or abdominal X-ray immediately after NGT insertion to verify the tube tip is positioned in the stomach before any feeding begins—this is the only method considered 100% reliable for detecting proper placement and preventing catastrophic complications such as aspiration pneumonia from tubes misplaced in the trachea. 1, 2, 3

  • The radiograph must confirm three critical elements: the tube is not coiled in the esophagus, it is not positioned in the lung or pleural cavity, and the tip is properly located in the stomach. 1, 3

  • Every patient must undergo radiographic confirmation of proper gastric position before feeding is initiated—this is non-negotiable despite the time and resource requirements. 1, 2

Why Radiography Is Essential

  • Between 2005 and 2010,45% of all cases of harm caused by misplaced nasogastric tubes were due to misinterpreted radiographs, yet radiography remains superior to all bedside methods. 1

  • Tubes can enter the lung, pleural cavity, or coil in the esophagus if position is not radiographically confirmed—complications that can be life-threatening. 1, 2, 3

  • Bedside auscultation has only 79% sensitivity and 61% specificity, making it dangerously unreliable as a sole confirmation method and should never replace radiographic verification. 1, 2, 3

Optimizing X-ray Quality

  • Keep the guidewire inside the tube during X-ray acquisition to improve visualization—the absence of a guidewire is associated with insufficient tube visibility on radiographs. 4

  • Be aware that high body mass index and male sex are associated with increased risk of insufficient tube visibility on X-ray, requiring supplementary attention to image quality in these patient profiles. 4

Alternative and Adjunctive Methods

Electromagnetic Guidance Systems

  • Electromagnetically guided NGT placement systems demonstrate 98% sensitivity (95% CI: 93.9%-99.7%) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 48.0%-100.0%) compared with chest X-ray, and can detect lung placements immediately during insertion. 5

  • When placed by a dedicated team, electromagnetic NGT systems minimize feeding delay (mean time to feeding 404 minutes vs. 185 minutes to confirmatory CXR) and reduce the need for multiple radiographs. 5

Bedside Ultrasound (Emerging but Not Yet Standard)

  • Bedside abdominal ultrasound shows 99.8% sensitivity (99.3%-100%) and 91.0% specificity (88.5%-93.6%) for confirming NGT placement when performed after specific training, but its suboptimal specificity means caution is necessary before implementing this as a replacement for radiography. 6

  • Ultrasound detection of the NGT in the esophagus has 88% sensitivity with 100% positive predictive value, while subxiphoid detection has only 64% sensitivity, indicating variable reliability depending on anatomic location. 7

  • Ultrasound may serve as a useful adjunct or preliminary test but should not replace radiographic confirmation given current evidence limitations and the need for operator training. 7, 6, 8

Ongoing Position Verification

  • After initial radiographic confirmation, pH testing of gastric aspirate with a threshold of ≤5.5 should be used to verify position prior to every subsequent use for routine monitoring between feedings. 2, 3

  • Recheck tube position radiographically if there is any clinical concern about migration, after patient repositioning, or if the external tube length marking has changed. 3

Securing the Tube to Prevent Dislodgement

  • Secure the tube properly with nasal bridles when possible, as 40-80% of NG tubes become dislodged without proper securement, and bridles reduce accidental removal from 36% to 10% compared to tape alone. 2, 3

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

  • Never rely solely on auscultation (the "whoosh test")—inappropriate tube locations such as in the lung, pleural cavity, or coiled in the esophagus may be misinterpreted as proper position by bedside auscultatory techniques. 1, 6

  • If dysphagia worsens with the tube in place, suspect pharyngeal coiling and perform endoscopic evaluation or reinsert the tube rather than proceeding with feeding. 9

  • For post-pyloric (nasojejunal) tubes, position must be confirmed by X-ray 8-12 hours after placement, not immediately, to allow time for the tube to migrate through the pylorus. 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Nasogastric Tube Position Confirmation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Confirming Nasogastric Tube Placement

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Nasogastric tube placement under sonographic observation: A comparison study of ultrasound and chest radiography in mechanically ventilated patients.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses, 2022

Research

Does Bedside Sonography Effectively Identify Nasogastric Tube Placements in Pediatric Critical Care Patients?

Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2016

Guideline

Nasogastric Tube Insertion Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.