Is "uncomplicated ultrasound‑guided liver biopsy" an appropriate impression for a liver biopsy that was performed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Is "Uncomplicated Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy" an Appropriate Impression?

Yes, "uncomplicated ultrasound-guided liver biopsy" is an appropriate and standard impression for documenting a liver biopsy procedure that was performed without adverse events. This terminology accurately conveys that the procedure was completed successfully using ultrasound guidance and that no complications occurred during or immediately after the intervention.

Rationale for This Impression

Standard Documentation Practice

  • The term "uncomplicated" is clinically meaningful because it explicitly communicates that no adverse events occurred during the procedure, which is essential information for subsequent clinical management 1.

  • Specifying "ultrasound-guided" is important because it documents the technique used, which has implications for complication rates and diagnostic accuracy 1.

  • This impression format aligns with standard radiology reporting conventions where the procedural approach and outcome are clearly stated 1.

Clinical Significance of the Term "Uncomplicated"

  • Major complications from liver biopsy occur in 0.5-2.2% of cases, with mortality rates of 0.07-0.09%, making documentation of an uncomplicated procedure clinically relevant 1.

  • Minor complications such as pain, bleeding requiring transfusion, or hemobilia occur in 2.5-15% of cases, so explicitly stating "uncomplicated" confirms none of these occurred 1, 2.

  • The majority of complications occur within the first hour of observation, and documenting an uncomplicated immediate post-procedure period provides reassurance about the patient's initial recovery 1.

Importance of Documenting Ultrasound Guidance

  • Ultrasound guidance reduces major complication rates from 2.2% (percussion-palpation technique) to 0.5% by avoiding gallbladder, large vessels, colon, and lung 1.

  • The use of ultrasound guidance (whether real-time or marking technique) is a quality indicator that should be documented in the procedural report 1.

  • Ultrasound guidance improves diagnostic yield and allows for safer needle placement, particularly in patients with obesity, small livers, or ascites 1.

What Should Be Included Beyond This Basic Impression

While "uncomplicated ultrasound-guided liver biopsy" is appropriate, a complete procedural report should also document:

  • Needle type and gauge used (typically 18-gauge for core biopsies) 1.

  • Number of passes performed (multiple passes show a trend toward increased adverse events with OR 2.32) 2.

  • Adequacy of specimen obtained (presence of portal tracts, specimen length) 1.

  • Immediate post-procedure vital signs (should be monitored every 15 minutes for the first hour) 1.

  • Patient positioning during recovery (though right lateral decubitus positioning may not be necessary and can increase pain) 1.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not omit documentation of the guidance technique used, as this affects interpretation of complication risk and quality metrics 1.

  • Ensure adequate observation time is documented (recommended 2-4 hours post-procedure, though some centers safely discharge after 1 hour) 1.

  • Document any minor symptoms even if they did not constitute complications (such as transient pain that resolved without intervention) 1.

  • If tract plugging with Gelfoam was used, this should be specified as it represents a modified technique with potentially lower bleeding risk 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.