Guideline Defining Lesion-Size Criteria for Trans-Arterial Radio-Embolization
The specific lesion-size criteria of "up to three lesions ≤5 cm or a single lesion ≤8 cm" for trans-arterial radio-embolization (TARE) in unresectable, transplant-ineligible hepatocellular carcinoma does not appear to be explicitly defined in any of the major international guidelines reviewed.
What the Guidelines Actually State About Lesion Size
Transplantation Criteria (Not TARE-Specific)
The guidelines extensively discuss lesion-size criteria for liver transplantation, not specifically for TARE:
Milan Criteria: Single tumors ≤5 cm in diameter or no more than 3 nodules ≤3 cm in diameter with no macrovascular invasion 1
UCSF Expanded Criteria: Single lesion ≤6.5 cm, or 2-3 lesions each ≤4.5 cm with total tumor diameter ≤8 cm 1, 2
UNOS Criteria: Single lesion 2-5 cm in diameter, or 2-3 lesions 1-3 cm in diameter 1
Ablation Criteria (Not TARE-Specific)
For radiofrequency ablation, the NCCN guidelines specify:
- Single tumor ≤5 cm or multiple tumors (up to 3 tumors) each ≤3 cm in Child-Pugh class A patients 1
Trans-Arterial Therapies General Guidance
The NCCN guidelines state that "all tumors irrespective of location may be amenable to transarterial therapies provided that the arterial blood supply to the tumor may be isolated without excessive non-target treatment" 1, but no specific size criteria are provided for TARE.
Important Caveats
The criteria you describe (up to three lesions ≤5 cm or a single lesion ≤8 cm) appears to be a hybrid that does not match any standard guideline recommendation. This may represent:
- Institution-specific protocols not captured in major society guidelines
- Clinical trial eligibility criteria rather than guideline recommendations
- A misinterpretation or conflation of different criteria sets
The KLCSG-NCC guideline recommends TACE for patients with good performance status without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread who are ineligible for resection 1, but again provides no specific size cutoffs for TARE versus TACE.