Is the aVR lead useful for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy on an electrocardiogram?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

aVR Lead in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Diagnosis

The aVR lead is NOT included in standard ECG criteria for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy and should not be used for this purpose. 1

Standard ECG Criteria for LVH (Without aVR)

The established voltage criteria for LVH diagnosis do not incorporate the aVR lead 1:

Primary Voltage Criteria

  • Sokolow-Lyon Index: S wave in V1 + R wave in V5 or V6 ≥ 3.5 mV 1
  • Cornell Voltage Criteria:
    • Men: S wave in V3 + R wave in aVL > 2.8 mV 1
    • Women: S wave in V3 + R wave in aVL > 2.0 mV 1
  • R wave in aVL > 1.1 mV is a standalone criterion with excellent specificity (98.3%) though modest sensitivity (19.6%) 2
  • R wave in V5 or V6 > 2.6 mV 1

Why aVR Is Not Used for LVH

The aVR lead has a unique spatial orientation that points toward the right shoulder and away from the left ventricle 3. While inverted aVR (–aVR) has proven useful for detecting exercise-induced ischemia and left main coronary disease because it aligns with the LV axis 3, it has never been validated or incorporated into diagnostic criteria for LVH.

Clinical Algorithm for LVH Diagnosis

Use this stepwise approach 1, 2:

  1. First, measure R wave in aVL:

    • If < 0.5 mV: LVH excluded 2
    • If > 1.0 mV: LVH confirmed 2
    • If 0.5-1.0 mV: Proceed to step 2 2
  2. Apply Cornell Voltage or Sokolow-Lyon criteria 1, 4

  3. Consider Romhilt-Estes point system (≥5 points = definite LVH, 4 points = probable LVH) 1

Supporting Features (Not Diagnostic Alone)

  • Lateral ST depression with T wave inversion 1
  • Left atrial abnormality 1, 5
  • Left axis deviation (QRS axis more negative than -30°) 1
  • QT interval prolongation 1

Critical Pitfalls

In Left Anterior Fascicular Block (LAFB): R-wave amplitude in leads I and aVL are NOT reliable for LVH diagnosis 1, 6. The superior and posterior QRS vector shift in LAFB artificially increases R waves in aVL 6, 7. Instead, use criteria incorporating S-wave depth in left precordial leads (V5, V6) 1, 6.

In Complete LBBB: ECG diagnosis of LVH should generally NOT be attempted, but if necessary, use QRS duration > 155 ms combined with precordial voltage criteria 1

In RBBB: Use specific modified criteria: SV1 > 2 mm, RV5 or V6 > 15 mm, and QRS axis left of -30° 1

Performance Characteristics

Among all criteria, Cornell voltage and Cornell product demonstrate the best overall diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.678-0.71) 4, 8. The R wave in aVL alone performs remarkably well in women, Caucasians, and with right bundle branch block, but decreases in myocardial infarction 2. Traditional criteria have high specificity (78-100%) but poor sensitivity (9-60%) 4, 8, 9.

References

Guideline

ECG Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Left Anterior Fascicular Block (LAFB) on ECG

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

EKG Criteria for Left Anterior Fascicular Block

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Electro- and echocardiographic features of left ventricle hypertrophy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.