Evaluation and Management of Nerve Root Compression
MRI without IV contrast is the single best imaging modality for evaluating nerve root compression, correctly identifying the causative lesion in 88% of surgically confirmed cases—far superior to CT (50%), myelography (57%), or CT myelography (81%). 1, 2
Initial Clinical Assessment
Red Flag Symptoms Requiring Urgent Imaging
Do not delay imaging if any of the following are present: 1
- Trauma or prior spine surgery
- Malignancy (known or suspected)
- Infection risk: fever, IV drug use, elevated inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP, WBC)
- Progressive neurologic deficits or new-onset weakness
- Cauda equina symptoms: bowel/bladder dysfunction, saddle anesthesia
- Intractable pain despite conservative therapy
- Systemic disease: ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory arthritis
- Vertebral body tenderness on palpation
- Autonomic instability: blood pressure fluctuations, syncope, sweating (suggests high cervical/thoracic cord compression) 3
When Conservative Management is Appropriate
Without red flags, most acute radiculopathy resolves spontaneously or with conservative treatment within 6 weeks. 1 Imaging is not required at initial presentation in these cases. 1
Proceed to imaging after 6 weeks if: 2
- Symptoms persist despite conservative therapy
- Patient is a surgical or interventional candidate
- New neurologic deficits develop
Imaging Algorithm
First-Line: MRI Without IV Contrast
Order MRI without IV contrast immediately for: 1, 3, 4, 2
- Cervical spine: suspected myelopathy, radiculopathy with red flags, or failed conservative therapy
- Lumbar spine: radiculopathy after 6 weeks conservative therapy, suspected cauda equina syndrome, or progressive neurologic deficits
- Thoracic spine: any suspected thoracic myelopathy (surgical emergency) 3
MRI protocol should include: 3, 4
- T2-weighted sequences (best for cord edema, disc herniation)
- Gradient-echo sequences (optimal for hematomas, bone fragments)
- Sagittal and axial planes with high spatial resolution
Image the entire spine when cord compression is suspected—20% of spine injuries have a second noncontiguous level. 3
When to Add IV Contrast to MRI
Add IV contrast only when: 4, 2
- Postoperative patients (distinguishes recurrent disc from scar/fibrosis) 1, 2
- Suspected infection (epidural abscess, discitis, osteomyelitis) 3, 4
- Known or suspected malignancy with new symptoms 3, 4
- Noncontrast MRI is nondiagnostic 2
Do not add contrast routinely for degenerative disease—it provides no benefit and increases cost/time. 4
Second-Line: CT Myelography
Use CT myelography when: 1, 4, 2
- MRI is contraindicated (non-MRI-safe implants, severe claustrophobia)
- MRI findings are equivocal or nondiagnostic 1, 2
- Significant metallic hardware artifact degrades MRI quality 1, 4
- Detailed visualization of lateral recess compression is needed 1, 2
CT myelography achieves 81% diagnostic accuracy for nerve root compression—superior to CT alone (50%) but inferior to MRI (88%). 4, 2
When CT Alone is Appropriate
Use CT without IV contrast for: 1, 4
- Acute trauma with suspected fracture (97% sensitivity for osseous fractures) 4
- Detailed bony anatomy for surgical planning (osteophytes, facet joints, uncovertebral joints) 1, 4
- Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) assessment 4
- Postoperative fusion assessment 1
Critical pitfall: CT alone cannot exclude spinal cord pathology and is markedly inferior to MRI for soft-tissue evaluation. 3, 4 Never rely on CT alone when myelopathy is clinically suspected. 4
Plain Radiographs: Limited Role
Radiographs are inadequate for evaluating nerve root compression (only 49-62% sensitivity for thoracic fractures, 67-82% for lumbar). 3
Consider radiographs only for: 4
- Initial evaluation of chronic neck pain without neurologic deficits or red flags
- Screening for gross malalignment or instability
- Rheumatoid arthritis patients (though MRI is superior for odontoid erosions: 67.5% vs 12.5% for radiographs) 4
Management Considerations
Conservative Management
For patients without red flags, initiate: 1
- Physical therapy
- NSAIDs or acetaminophen
- Activity modification
- Reassess at 6 weeks
Surgical Referral Indications
Urgent neurosurgical consultation for: 3
- Cauda equina syndrome (bowel/bladder dysfunction)
- Progressive motor weakness despite conservative therapy
- Myelopathy with cord compression on imaging
- Autonomic instability with high cervical/thoracic compression 3
Elective surgical consideration after: 2
- 6 weeks of failed conservative therapy
- Persistent radiculopathy with MRI-confirmed nerve root compression
- Functional impairment affecting quality of life
Multidisciplinary Coordination
Pathologic fractures require coordination between interventional radiology, surgery, and radiation oncology. 3
Epidural abscess requires emergent MRI with contrast, neurosurgical consultation, and infectious disease involvement. 3
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not rely on physical examination alone: Physical exam tests correlate poorly with MRI evidence of cervical nerve root compression (high false-positive and false-negative rates). 1
Beware of imaging-clinical mismatch: Degenerative findings on MRI are common in asymptomatic patients >30 years old and correlate poorly with symptoms. 1, 2 The abnormal MRI level may not correspond to clinical examination findings. 2
Do not delay imaging for red flags: Progressive myelopathy with autonomic instability may require urgent surgical decompression. 3, 4
Do not use CT alone for suspected myelopathy: CT cannot visualize the spinal cord itself and misses 75% of ligamentous injuries and 100% of cord injuries detected by MRI. 3, 4
Consider extraforaminal pathology: Conventional axial and sagittal MRI may miss extraforaminal disc herniations—consider oblique sequences or 3D MR rendering if clinical suspicion is high despite negative standard imaging. 5, 6
Suspect conjoined nerve roots: If imaging shows a "disc herniation" but the patient presents with nerve root claudication (rather than typical radiculopathy) and minimal neurologic deficit, consider conjoined nerve root anomaly (5.8% incidence, mainly S1 and L5 levels). 7 Treatment requires laminectomy and foraminotomy, not simple discectomy. 7