What are the approved diagnostic and prognostic tests for cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 10, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Approved Diagnostic and Prognostic Tests for Cancer

The approved diagnostic and prognostic tests for cancer are highly cancer-specific and include immunohistochemistry panels, molecular biomarker testing (EGFR, ALK, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HER2, ER/PR), next-generation sequencing, and tissue-agnostic markers (MSI, TMB, PD-L1, NTRK), all of which must be performed in CLIA-certified laboratories. 1

Cancer-Specific Molecular Testing Requirements

Lung Cancer

  • All patients with lung adenocarcinoma require molecular testing for EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangements, ROS1 rearrangements, BRAF V600E mutations, PD-L1 expression, and NRAS mutations to guide targeted therapy selection 1
  • Next-generation sequencing techniques are increasingly used as more biomarkers are identified and validated 2
  • Blood-based tumor mutation burden (TMB) shows association with improved atezolizumab clinical benefit, though unique assays and cut-offs are not yet standardized 2

Colorectal Cancer

  • All colorectal adenocarcinomas must be tested for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations to predict response to anti-EGFR antibody therapy 1

Breast Cancer

  • All invasive breast cancers require testing for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status by immunohistochemistry and/or FISH 1

Prostate Cancer

  • Tumor-based molecular assays provide prognostic information independent of NCCN risk groups, including likelihood of biochemical recurrence after surgery or radiotherapy and likelihood of developing metastasis 2
  • Several tissue-based molecular assays have received positive reviews by the Molecular Diagnostic Services Program (MolDX) and are likely covered by CMS, though no randomized controlled trials have studied their utility 2
  • Routine use of serum markers such as CEA is not recommended 2

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) Diagnostic Algorithm

Initial Immunohistochemistry Panel

  • Broad-spectrum cytokeratin (AE1/AE3, OSCAR) to confirm epithelial origin 1
  • CD45 to exclude hematologic malignancy 1
  • SOX10 and/or S100 to exclude melanoma 1
  • CK7 and CK20 staining patterns provide clues to primary site 2, 1

Sex-Specific Testing

  • Males with adenocarcinoma bone metastases: PSA testing mandatory 2
  • Males with adenocarcinoma bone metastases: PSMA and/or NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry to rule out prostate cancer 1
  • Females with axillary adenopathy: Estrogen and progesterone receptor testing, GATA3 immunohistochemistry 2, 1
  • Females with peritoneal carcinomatosis: Consider serous histologic type adenocarcinoma workup 2

Specialized Testing for Specific Presentations

  • Patients with midline metastatic disease: Serum α-fetoprotein and β-human chorionic gonadotropin to exclude extragonadal germ-cell tumors 2
  • Poorly differentiated cases: Immunohistochemistry to exclude lymphomas and germ-cell tumors 2
  • Neuroendocrine differentiation: Synaptophysin and/or INSM1 immunohistochemistry, plasma chromogranin A 2, 1

Tissue-Agnostic Predictive Biomarkers

Immunotherapy Response Markers

  • MSI (microsatellite instability), PD-L1, and TMB (tumor mutation burden) determination is generally recommended when immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment is considered 2
  • Higher PD-L1 expression and higher TMB are associated with better response rates and longer survival in previously treated CUP patients receiving nivolumab 2

Targeted Therapy Markers

  • NTRK rearrangements predict response to NTRK inhibitors irrespective of tissue of origin 2

Prognostic Laboratory Parameters

Adverse Prognostic Factors

  • Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is an independent adverse prognostic factor across multiple cancer types 2
  • Elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) indicates worse prognosis 2
  • Low serum albumin and lymphopenia or elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) reflect inflammatory state and worse outcomes 2

Risk Stratification for CUP

  • The recommended two-factor prognostic score combines ECOG performance status with LDH levels: good prognosis (ECOG PS 0-1 and normal LDH) versus poor prognosis (ECOG PS >1 or elevated LDH) 2

Molecular Prognostic Markers

  • KRAS or NRAS activation and CDKN2A deletion confer independent adverse prognosis 2
  • TP53 mutations or deletions of chromosome 17p are associated with poor prognosis in oligometastatic CUP 2

Technical Requirements and Quality Standards

Laboratory Certification

  • All molecular testing used for patient management must be performed in CLIA-certified laboratories 1
  • Laboratories must validate assays and participate in proficiency testing at least semiannually 1

Specimen Requirements

  • Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the standard specimen type, with cytology preparations increasingly accepted 1
  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for comprehensive genomic profiling, real-time PCR for highly targeted mutation detection, and FISH for copy number alterations and gene rearrangements are the recommended methodologies 1

Critical Limitations

Screening Limitations

  • Most tumor markers lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity for population-based screening and are primarily used for prognosis, treatment selection, and monitoring 1
  • Cell-free DNA testing is most effective when combined with other biomarkers rather than as standalone screening, with particularly low sensitivity for early-stage disease 1

Intratumoral Heterogeneity

  • Approximately 80% of prostatectomy specimens are multifocal, and intratumoral heterogeneity for DNA and RNA markers may limit prognostic utility due to sampling bias 2
  • Approximately 20% of lymph node metastases derive from nonindex lesions, potentially limiting molecular testing accuracy 2

References

Guideline

Laboratory Tests for Cancer Detection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.