What is the incidence and rarity of secondary non‑Hodgkin lymphoma involving the larynx?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 10, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Secondary Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of the Larynx: Rarity and Incidence

Secondary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma involving the larynx is exceedingly rare, accounting for less than 1% of all laryngeal neoplasms, with primary laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma representing approximately 95% of laryngeal malignancies. 1, 2, 3

Epidemiologic Context

  • Primary laryngeal lymphomas (not secondary involvement) represent less than 1% of all laryngeal neoplasms, making secondary involvement even more uncommon 1, 2, 4

  • Among the rare cases of laryngeal lymphoma, the vast majority are primary extranodal presentations rather than secondary spread from systemic disease 2, 5

  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma overall accounts for approximately 4% of all new cancer cases in the United States, but laryngeal involvement—whether primary or secondary—remains an exceptional finding 6

  • In contrast, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma is far more common, with an estimated 12,630 new cases annually in the United States 7

Anatomic Distribution When Laryngeal Involvement Occurs

  • When lymphoma does involve the larynx (primary or secondary), the supraglottic region is preferentially affected, with the subglottis being infrequently involved 5

  • NK/T-cell lymphomas, which are predominantly extranodal, can involve the upper aerodigestive tract including the larynx, but this represents a small subset of an already rare lymphoma subtype 7

Clinical Implications of Rarity

  • The extreme rarity creates diagnostic challenges, as clinicians have low index of suspicion and histopathologic confirmation is often difficult even with multiple biopsies 1, 2

  • Because of insufficient case numbers, no consensus exists for optimal management of laryngeal lymphoma, and treatment typically follows standard NHL protocols (such as R-CHOP chemotherapy ± involved-field radiation) rather than larynx-specific approaches 1, 2

  • Secondary laryngeal involvement by systemic lymphoma or leukemic infiltration carries a very poor prognosis, in contrast to localized primary laryngeal lymphomas which often present as stage IE/IIE disease with favorable outcomes after local radiation 5

Key Diagnostic Pitfall

  • When evaluating laryngeal masses, the overwhelming likelihood (>95%) is squamous cell carcinoma, not lymphoma 3

  • However, in patients with known systemic NHL presenting with new laryngeal symptoms, secondary involvement must be distinguished from a new primary squamous cell carcinoma, tumor-flare reaction from immunomodulatory therapy, or other etiologies through biopsy and systemic restaging 8

References

Guideline

Laryngeal Lymphoma: Clinical Characteristics and Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Subglotic malt-lymphoma of the larynx: an unusual presentation of chronic cough.

International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology, 2014

Guideline

Primary Splenic Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Pathophysiology and Development

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of Severe Hip Pain in Non‑Hodgkin Lymphoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.