Can you provide a detailed, step-by-step analysis and interpretation of an electrocardiogram?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 10, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Systematic ECG Analysis and Interpretation

A complete ECG analysis requires a structured, five-step approach: assess rate and rhythm, measure intervals (PR, QRS, QTc), determine electrical axis, analyze waveform morphology (P waves, QRS complexes, ST segments, T waves), and identify any arrhythmias or conduction abnormalities—all interpreted within the clinical context. 1, 2

Step 1: Rate and Rhythm Assessment

Calculate heart rate and evaluate rhythm regularity as your initial step:

  • Heart rate calculation: Count the number of large squares (5 mm) between consecutive R waves and divide 300 by this number, or count QRS complexes in a 6-second strip and multiply by 10 2
  • Normal heart rate: 60-100 beats per minute 2, 3
  • Rhythm regularity: Examine R-R intervals for consistency across the tracing 2
  • Identify the underlying rhythm: Determine if the rhythm is sinus, atrial, junctional, or ventricular based on P wave morphology and its relationship to QRS complexes 2

Common pitfall: Do not rely solely on automated heart rate calculations without visual verification, as artifacts can produce erroneous readings 4

Step 2: Interval Measurements

Measure critical intervals using standardized calibration (25 mm/second paper speed, 10 mm/mV amplitude):

PR Interval

  • Normal range: 120-200 ms (3-5 small squares) 2, 3
  • Significance: Assesses atrioventricular conduction 2
  • Abnormalities: PR >200 ms indicates first-degree AV block; PR <120 ms suggests pre-excitation 1

QRS Duration

  • Normal range: <120 ms (<3 small squares) 2, 3
  • Significance: Evaluates ventricular conduction 2
  • Abnormalities: QRS ≥120 ms indicates bundle branch block or ventricular conduction delay 1

QT/QTc Interval

  • Normal QTc: <450 ms for men, <460 ms for women 2, 3
  • Significance: Assesses ventricular repolarization and arrhythmia risk 2
  • Critical threshold: QTc changes ≥60 ms represent significant repolarization abnormalities 1

Technical requirement: Use time-coherent data from simultaneously acquired leads to capture the earliest onset and latest offset of waveforms for accurate global measurements, as single-channel recordings systematically underestimate durations 4

Step 3: Electrical Axis Determination

Quickly determine the cardiac axis quadrant using leads I and aVF:

  • Normal axis: -30° to +90° 2
  • Left axis deviation: Positive deflection in lead I, negative in aVF (axis more negative than -30°) 2
  • Right axis deviation: Negative deflection in lead I, positive in aVF (axis more positive than +90°) 2
  • Clinical significance: Axis deviation reflects chamber enlargement, myocardial hypertrophy, and conduction abnormalities that directly impact morbidity and mortality 2

Important caveat: The same ECG pattern may occur in different structural states, explaining the frequent low specificity for determining disease etiology—always integrate with clinical data 2

Step 4: Waveform Morphology Analysis

P Wave Assessment

  • Normal morphology: Upright in leads I, II, aVF; biphasic in V1 2
  • Normal duration: <120 ms 2
  • Normal amplitude: <2.5 mm 2
  • Abnormalities: Peaked P waves suggest right atrial enlargement; notched, widened P waves suggest left atrial enlargement 2

QRS Complex Analysis

  • Pathological Q waves: ≥0.04 seconds (1 mm) wide AND ≥25% (one-third) of R-wave amplitude 3
  • Significance: Pathological Q waves suggest prior myocardial infarction 2, 3
  • R wave progression: R-wave amplitude should increase from V1 to V4, then decrease toward V6 2
  • Poor R-wave progression: Loss of normal progression in V1-V4 indicates anterior wall abnormality 3

Critical consideration: Pre-existing bundle branch blocks reduce the reliability of Q-wave criteria for old MI, requiring expert interpretation 3

ST Segment Evaluation

  • Measurement point: Assess ST segments at the J point (junction of QRS and ST segment) 2
  • ST elevation: ≥1 mm elevation suggests acute myocardial injury, pericarditis, or ventricular aneurysm 3, 5
  • ST depression: Indicates subendocardial ischemia, especially when widespread with T-wave inversion 5
  • Up-sloping ST depression with positive T waves: Increasingly recognized as severe left anterior descending artery obstruction 5
  • Widespread ST depression with aVR elevation: Represents diffuse subendocardial ischemia from severe coronary disease requiring urgent angiography 5

T Wave Analysis

  • Normal morphology: Upright in leads I, II, V3-V6; inverted in aVR; variable in III, aVL, aVF, V1, V2 2
  • T-wave inversions: May indicate ischemia, ventricular hypertrophy, or bundle branch block 1

Additional Features

  • U waves: May indicate hypokalemia, bradycardia, or other metabolic conditions 2
  • QRS fragmentation or notching: Persistent changes from prior infarction 3

Step 5: Identify Arrhythmias and Conduction Abnormalities

Systematically search for:

  • Atrial arrhythmias: Atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, premature atrial contractions 6
  • Ventricular arrhythmias: Premature ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia 6
  • AV blocks: First-degree (PR >200 ms), second-degree (Mobitz I or II), third-degree (complete heart block) 1
  • Bundle branch blocks: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) or left bundle branch block (LBBB) with QRS ≥120 ms 1, 3
  • Pre-excitation syndromes: Short PR interval with delta wave 1

Critical Technical Considerations

Ensure proper technique to avoid misdiagnosis:

  • Electrode placement: Incorrect precordial lead positioning significantly alters QRS morphology and ST-segment interpretation, potentially causing false diagnoses 3, 4
  • Frequency response: Minimum 150 Hz for adults, 250 Hz for children; inadequate response causes systematic underestimation of amplitudes and smoothing of pathological Q waves 3, 4
  • Artifact recognition: Muscle tremor, baseline wander, and poor electrode contact obscure ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities 3
  • Calibration verification: Standard settings (25 mm/second, 10 mm/mV) are essential for accurate voltage and interval measurements 3, 4

Special Clinical Contexts

Adjust interpretation based on patient factors:

  • Age and gender: QT intervals are typically longer in women; normal values vary with age 2
  • Medications: Antiarrhythmics, psychotropics, and other drugs affect ECG findings 2
  • Ventricular hypertrophy: Can mask or mimic infarction patterns, requiring accurate voltage calibration 3
  • Serial comparison: Compare with previous ECGs using identical calibration settings to detect interval changes 3, 4

Physician Verification Requirement

All computer-generated ECG interpretations must be verified by a qualified physician, as automated systems achieve only 91.3% accuracy compared to 96.0% for cardiologists. 4 Computer interpretation serves as an adjunct, not a replacement, for clinical judgment 2, 3, 4

Final integration: Always interpret ECG findings in context of cardiac biomarkers, symptoms, imaging studies, and clinical presentation, as standardized ECG findings alone may have low specificity for determining disease etiology 3, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

ECG Interpretation Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

ECG Calibration Standards for Accurate Myocardial Infarction Detection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

ECG Signal Processing and Interpretation Standards

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

ECG diagnosis and classification of acute coronary syndromes.

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2014

Research

[Analysis of pacemaker ECGs].

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2015

Related Questions

What is the best initial step in managing a 68-year-old man with progressive shortness of breath, orthopnea, and a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and myocardial infarction, presenting with tachycardia, hypoxemia, jugular venous distension, and bilateral crackles?
What is the significance of the axis of the electrocardiogram (ECG) in diagnosing cardiac conditions?
Can an electrocardiogram (ECG) show bradycardia while the pulse count is normal, and which one is considered superior?
How do I interpret an electrocardiogram (EKG)?
What is the management plan for a 34-year-old female without prior medical history presenting with chest burn and T wave inversion in leads V1-V3 on electrocardiogram (ECG)?
In a 3‑month‑old infant with severe hypovolemic hyponatremic dehydration, elevated serum creatinine and high‑anion‑gap metabolic acidosis, should I give full isotonic fluid replacement or restrict fluids?
What is the optimal acute management for a 45-year-old man with new-onset seizures, chronic heavy alcohol use (25 years) who stopped drinking 6 days ago, visible jaundice, and recent constipation?
What are the Australian guidelines for measles prevention, vaccination schedule, post‑exposure prophylaxis, isolation, and management?
Is there a structured interview for ICD‑11 diagnostic coding?
What are the causes of xanthomas?
Which acute kidney injury patient is most likely to have hydronephrosis on renal ultrasound: a 19‑year‑old female with Escherichia coli O157:H7–associated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; a 57‑year‑old male bartender with gonococcal sepsis and purpura fulminans; a 58‑year‑old woman receiving chemotherapy and radiation for advanced cervical cancer; a 75‑year‑old man with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; or an elderly nursing‑home resident woman with pyelonephritis and sepsis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.